Divorce doesn’t just divide two people, it often splits households, habits, and even the smallest possessions. A recent Reddit post showed how one dad’s patience finally snapped after his ex-wife repeatedly kept items he lent to their children. The list included a phone, tools, and even an old iPod.
Instead of shrugging it off, he escalated the matter by involving the police, sparking a debate about boundaries, parenting, and what counts as “petty” in a high-conflict co-parenting relationship. Was he protecting his rights, or fanning the flames of an already tense dynamic? Let’s unpack the story.
One divorced father shared how his ex-wife repeatedly kept his belongings whenever their kids brought them to her house













The OP’s frustration is understandable, his ex repeatedly kept items he owned, even after written requests for return. The ex-wife, meanwhile, framed her actions as protecting or supporting the children in her household, including stepkids. Both motivations make sense on the surface, but the execution, flat refusals to return property, inevitably triggered conflict.
At its root, this is about blurred lines between parental responsibility and shared custody. Research from the American Psychological Association shows that conflict between divorced parents, even when not directed at the children, can negatively affect kids’ emotional adjustment.
The issue here isn’t really about a phone, tools, or an iPod, it’s about control and resentment, with the children caught in the middle. When one parent “borrows” property for stepchildren and refuses to return it, the message to the biological children may feel like their needs are secondary to those of the new family.
Family law experts often advise clear documentation. According to attorney and mediator Christina McGhee, “Parents should have agreements about property use written into their parenting plans when possible, to reduce confusion and limit opportunities for conflict.”
OP did the right thing by requesting returns in writing, but once repeated refusals piled up, escalating to law enforcement became less about spite and more about creating accountability.
Still, while calling the police produced a short-term fix, it also risks deepening hostility and undermining cooperative parenting. Courts generally prefer disputes like this be handled through family mediation, not criminal channels, unless theft is extreme or ongoing.
Mediation could create ground rules: for example, property brought to one house must be returned within 48 hours, and items belonging to a parent cannot be permanently reassigned to stepchildren.
OP should:
- Reinforce ownership with the kids (if it belongs to Dad, it goes back to Dad).
- Minimize cross-house transfers unless absolutely necessary for schoolwork.
- Seek mediation or court clarification to set property-use boundaries.
- Stay child-focused: frame disputes around the children’s wellbeing, not adult rivalry.
Here’s how people reacted to the post:
These Reddit users slammed the ex’s theft, urging legal escalation


This group warned of the ex’s resentment toward the kids



These commenters pushed for court over custody




Some Redditors called her actions abusive




And this couple suggested preventing items from going over



What looks like a squabble over gadgets may actually be a power struggle over respect. This dad’s choice to call the police wasn’t just about an iPod, it was about drawing a line. Co-parenting works best when both parents honor each other’s roles, but when one repeatedly blurs those lines, conflict is inevitable.
Do you think he was right to involve law enforcement, or was it an overreaction to an ex’s pettiness? And how would you handle co-parenting when stepkids enter the mix? Share your thoughts!






