It is an uncomfortable, often painful dynamic: the successful sibling is pressured to become the financial safety net for the sibling who is struggling. For one 29-year-old Redditor, that tension boiled over when his parents asked him to fund his sister’s return to college.
The brother is an actuary with a high income, engaged, and planning his own future. His 27-year-old sister had previously failed out of college due to partying and now works as a cashier.
Because the parents lost their savings, they believe the brother should step in and pay for her tuition and/or let her live in his home rent-free. His swift rejection of the idea has led to him being labeled “the greedy brother.”
Now, read the full story:














![Actuary Refuses To Fund Slacker Sister’s College, Gets Labeled 'Greedy' Even though my sister has never done anything to help me. So yeah, Am I really the [bad guy] here?](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/wp-editor-1762542554642-13.webp)
The brother’s position is completely understandable: it’s his money, his life, and his personal goals. When he looks at the situation, he sees a direct result of his sister’s past irresponsibility and a future of his own savings being drained. He has every right to refuse this demand.
However, the raw frustration in his post also hints at a deeper, long-standing issue of sibling resentment. The phrase “entirely her own fault for not working hard when she was younger” reveals that the conflict isn’t just about the tuition money; it is about years of watching a sibling make poor choices while he quietly built his success.
This dynamic of expecting a successful sibling to be the financial “savior” is incredibly common and toxic. As a clinical psychologist specializing in family conflict puts it, parents should avoid setting up one child to be the “financial safety net for their sibling.”
Pushing one child into a caretaker role can easily lead to anxiety, burnout, and profound resentment toward the parents. The brother’s reluctance to help is less about greed and more about a justified fear of being perpetually overburdened.
While the brother’s decision to protect his finances is perfectly valid, the Reddit community did raise some nuanced points about his harsh judgment. The sister, now 27, is trying to become a nurse, a concrete, difficult career goal. People change, and adult learners who return to college often find great success.
In fact, the data supports the sister’s new ambition. Adult learners returning to college have a high completion rate, with 68% of community college and 70% of online four-year students completing their credentials.
These adult students are typically much more focused than they were as teenagers, and the career change can lead to significant upward mobility.
This doesn’t mean the brother has to write a check, but it does challenge his dismissive view that she is doomed to fail because of her past.
He is not obligated to pay, but as one Redditor suggested, he could “help emotionally, help her look for scholarships or financial aid, just help by understanding that we all move through life in our own ways.”
Check out how the community responded:
The overwhelming consensus was that the OP is NTA for refusing to pay, as it is not his responsibility.


![Actuary Refuses To Fund Slacker Sister’s College, Gets Labeled 'Greedy' 335BTF - NTA, your sister is entitled to Jack and [nothing] and Jack skipped town.](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/wp-editor-1762542150586-2.webp)





However, a strong second theme was that the OP was overly judgmental and lacking empathy.
![Actuary Refuses To Fund Slacker Sister’s College, Gets Labeled 'Greedy' PGTips240 - NTA for not giving her the money... but you're being kind of a [jerk] by](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/wp-editor-1762542120574-1.webp)

![Actuary Refuses To Fund Slacker Sister’s College, Gets Labeled 'Greedy' ManyRoses13 - That said, you may not be the [bad guy] for refusing to pay for her schooling,](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/wp-editor-1762542122497-3.webp)
![Actuary Refuses To Fund Slacker Sister’s College, Gets Labeled 'Greedy' but you sound like kind of an [bad guy] for just lacking empathy for someone trying to turn their life around.](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/wp-editor-1762542123496-4.webp)
![Actuary Refuses To Fund Slacker Sister’s College, Gets Labeled 'Greedy' If that was the entirety of your issue, I might call you the [bad guy], because that is a [awful] reason to not help out your kin.](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/wp-editor-1762542125122-6.webp)
The most balanced advice focused on finding a middle ground that did not involve writing a blank check.

How to Navigate a Situation Like This
The key to navigating this situation is setting a firm financial boundary while offering non-financial support. By saying no to the money, the OP is protecting his future. By offering guidance, he can support his sister’s long-term success.
-
Stop the Guilt Trip: Tell your parents and sister, “I am happy to help you find financial aid, but I cannot fund your tuition or provide free housing.” Do not give a reason; simply state the boundary. The family is trying to use the “family” card to get access to money, and you must firmly say no.
-
Offer Conditional Support: Instead of a check, offer to help her create a budget, navigate the student loan/financial aid application process, or even pay for one small, non-recurring cost like an expensive textbook or a laptop for school. This shows support for her goal without sacrificing your own financial well-being.
-
Prioritize Your Partner: You are getting married. Your primary financial responsibility is now to your partner and your combined future. Your sister is a grown adult who has the capacity to access student loans, grants, and part-time work to fund her education.
The Definition of Support
Ultimately, the OP is right to protect his future. His primary conflict is not with his sister, but with his parents, who are trying to solve their own financial problems by pressuring their successful son.
The best outcome is not a payment, but a conversation that shifts the focus from “Why won’t you pay?” to “How can we make your plan work?” The OP can choose to support his sister’s journey without funding it.
What do you think? If you were the brother, would you feel tempted to at least let your sister live in your house rent-free to ease her burden, or is that too large a boundary to cross?









