Daily Highlight
  • MOVIE
  • TV
  • CELEB
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • MCU
  • DISNEY
  • About US
Daily Highlight
No Result
View All Result

Arrogant Lawyer Tells Valuer To “Read The Lease,” So He Does And Destroys His Client’s Case Using The Law

by Annie Nguyen
November 12, 2025
in Social Issues

Small business owners often sign leases under pressure, trusting the fine print will stay fair. When landlords spot a chance to hike rent mid-term, they forget that laws exist to level the playing field, especially for one-person shops fighting to survive.

The original poster, a property valuer, stepped in to help a bookseller facing a 50% rent jump after renewing a five-year lease. The landlord refused to let him walk and threatened lawsuits.

OP called the owner’s lawyer, begging for mercy, only to get a smug “read the lease.” So he did, every word. Read on to find out the statutory breach that flipped the table and left the landlord begging!

One specialist valuer fights to save a solo bookseller from a rent-jacking landlord, only to weaponize a crossed-out clause into victory

Arrogant Lawyer Tells Valuer To “Read The Lease,” So He Does And Destroys His Client’s Case Using The Law
Not the actual photo

Ok Mr lawyer i will!?

TLDR: lawyer tried to hardball my client, i proved his client committed a statutory offense

and got what i wanted plus damages and dobbed his client in. So i work as a specialist property valuer.

A few years ago a real estate agent friend approached me on behalf of his client.

His client was a book seller who operated a specialist book shop on the 7th floor of a City building.

A one man band small business. Nice bloke. Unfortunately nice bloke had decided to renew his lease for 5 years

and signed the new lease without getting advice. His new building owner enacted the market rent review clause

and jacked up his rent by something like 50%. Tells nice bloke, your new rent for the next 5 years is x.

Nice bloke is distraught! He cant afford it. So he asks nicely to rescind the lease and he will move elsewhere.

Estate agent friend has found a cheaper space for him. Denied by building owner.

Building owner says he will also sue if he breaks the lease. So the agents asks me to review the case.

I look through the case. Nice bloke is stuffed. The lease is lock tight and they are justified in jacking up the rent.

I think our only hope is to appeal to the mercy of the building owners lawyer.

So i call him and ask for release, penalty free, for my client. Mr Lawyer says "stiff cheddar,

you need to comply with the law, try reading the lease". A real arrogant a-hole. Cue malicious compliance "ok, i will".

I read through the lease and note that all references to the Retail Leases Act have been crossed out.

Fair enough. The act only applies to retail tenancies IF they are below the 3rd floor of a building.

Nice bloke is on level 7. Act should not apply. But hold up imma gonna check that.

I call the small business commission who administer the act, and they advise that, if you retail a good (like books)

it doesn't matter what floor you are on the act applies. You could be on the friggen roof if you want.

The level 3 provision only applies if you retail a service. This means the building owner has breached the act

and failed to comply with the law (theres certain things they have to provide before signing a lease

and timing they have to follow). A breach is no small thing. I get a ruling from the commission.

I call for mediation with Mr Lawyer. Present are Mr Lawyer, building owner and their agent and nice bloke and me.

I again plead for a penalty free release. No dice and they threaten to sue.

I gently slide the ruling accross the table to Mr Lawyer. Me:"Ok. Well as per your suggestion i read the lease.

We have a ruling that proves the act applies to the lease. Your clients failed to comply with the act

and committed a statutory offense ". Lawyer: (reads ruling)...."um ok. We will grant you a penalty free release"

Me: "oh. We dont need that. We enact our right under the act to terminate the lease, penalty free,

and to seek damages for the landlords breach of their statutory obligations and ill be reporting the breach to the commission "

Lawyer: "no need for all that, lets just tear up the lease". Me: "sorry, that wouldn't be complying with the law would it?"

There’s a quiet kind of satisfaction in seeing arrogance undone by the very rules it tries to exploit. Everyone has encountered a situation where someone in a position of power, often armed with authority or legal jargon, dismisses a plea for fairness.

In this story, a property valuer stepped in to help a small business owner trapped in an unfair lease agreement. The landlord’s lawyer, confident in his dominance, smugly told him to “read the lease.”

He did, and discovered the law the lawyer had overlooked. What followed was not a loud victory, but a deeply gratifying one rooted in patience, diligence, and integrity.

From a psychological standpoint, OP’s motivation wasn’t vengeance; it was justice. His calm, methodical response reflects what psychologists call cognitive control, the ability to regulate emotions and respond with strategy rather than impulse.

According to Dr. David Chester, an expert on the psychology of revenge, people seek retribution not only to punish but to reclaim autonomy and restore moral balance. OP’s choice to let the law speak, rather than emotion, exemplifies a higher form of retribution: one guided by fairness rather than fury.

The lawyer’s arrogance, on the other hand, highlights what social psychologists identify as status bias, the tendency to assume correctness and superiority based on perceived authority. This overconfidence blinded him to the very details that would unravel his case. OP’s humility became his strength; his curiosity, his weapon.

Interestingly, the real “malicious compliance” here is driven by principle. By simply doing what the lawyer instructed, read the lease, OP exposed a deeper truth: that power without integrity often collapses under its own weight.

His act reminds us that revenge doesn’t always require confrontation; sometimes it’s found in precision, patience, and professionalism.

In moments when others dismiss us with arrogance or deceit, what truly restores balance, fighting fire with fire, or quietly letting truth and competence do the work? Perhaps real power lies not in defeating others, but in letting fairness win for us.

Here’s the feedback from the Reddit community:

These Redditors savored the lawyer’s Pikachu-face comeback line

PN_Guin − Me: "sorry, that wouldn't be complying with the law would it? " Well done.

That must have been extremely satisfying to tell them.

DoctorTaeNy − Me: "sorry, that wouldn't be complying with the law would it? " Too bad you can't take a picture

and post it up here; I would love to see that 'surprised pikachu' face on the opposing lawyer!

xzElmozx − Lmao I love that he was all for f__king you over by following the letter of the law

riiiight up until it ended up f__king him and his client over, at which point he was all for just tearing up the lease.

F__k yea for reporting him on that, scummy fucks. Some landlords and their lawyers are the lowest of the low,

so seeing them get boned puts a smile on my face. Nice research OP! Hope (well I'm sure) the client was super thankful you were called in!

This trio popped justice boners over the epic lawyering win

BKStephens − Justice boner engorged!

Icefeldt − Boom! Lawyered! :) Very nice.

HometownHero89 − Amazing. Well done!

Vets shared tales of greedy landlords backfiring into empty buildings

damageddude − Years ago my wife had a one person landlord/tenant law practice here in the US.

It was basically a one person show, so if my wife had to go to court, the office was empty.

Not usually a big deal as this was the type of practice that was mostly cell phone and laptop.

Technically it was a two person partnership law practice, but my participation was limited to reviewing contracts

and going to court once in a while if she two cases at the same time. So, there was one tenant client

who had a dispute with her deposit and damages. Long story short, not only would her landlord

not give the deposit back but claimed there were extra damages. Our case was weak as our client

didn't have proof that the damages in the apartment were preexisting or caused by external forces

(a window was allegedly cracked by a tree branch from the outside). Now, in my state, if the landlord does not

provide a detailed list of damages or the the deposit, automatically the landlord has statutorily failed

his or her role and now owes double the deposit. Guess who didn't comply with the statute?

The now double deposit amount exceeded what the landlord was demanding so were willing to settle

for the difference. Nope. Mediation fails and we go to the judge. Now, before I continue, this landlord was an arrogant SOB

who didn't know the law. He was a computer engineer who thought his shiat didn't smell

and the rental was just a second investment property. We (I got involved at one point) tried to explain the law

when offering the deal, but no dice. He thought a law firm that didn't even have regular office hours

during the business day (not really required in our line of work -- really only needed the office as a space

nicer than Starbucks to meet with clients) was too far beneath him. Now the way LT court works is that

you have two rounds of meditation before you see a judge. Most cases settle before you get to the judge

so if it gets that far, the judge is looking to see who is being unreasonable.

The judge rules for the landlord, though he disagrees with some of the cost estimates and awards him a bit less money,

but reminds the LL that he owes double the deposit so he needs to give T some money

(more than what we would have had to pay if he just accepted our offer). LL doesn't agree with the judges findings

and appeals (larger court fees). When my wife gets the paperwork she sees he screwed up the appeal.

Since she wasn't his lawyer she didn't have to tell him he screwed up. She didn't even have to respond to the court.

Instead she quietly put a lien on the property for the judgment, added a fee for the extra paper work

involving the fee, and went on her merry way. Years go by. One day, we get an email from the email

the LL asking us to remove the lien as he is selling the property. Gladly, just pay the judgement and fees.

LL refuses and hires his own lawyer to fight us. This time we have the strong case.

We simply show the attorney the paper work and how everything was proper on our end

and it's not our fault LL tried to play lawyer without seeking legal advice. Long story short, our client gets her money,

we get our legal fee, and LL gets a bill from the attorney that he hired that probably negated

whatever the judge awarded LL. tl;tr - mess with the horns, get the bull even if it takes awhile

StoicJim − This makes me happy. I've seen so many small shops close because the owners got greedy

and forced them out of business with excessive rent demands. Then the building sits empty for months

while the owner awaits his big payoff.

Pros stressed reading every lease word and Act overhauls

SkwrlTail − As I said previously: ALWAYS. Read. The. Lease. Every damn word. Don't just TLDR to the bottom and sign.

Lionel--Hutz − Ah the Victorian Retail Leases Act, always trips a few people up with the commissioner rulings!

Personally I think the Act needs an overhaul to fix some of its ambiguities. Well done!

A cocky lawyer demands legal rigor, only to watch his client fund the tenant’s escape hatch with extras. Do you think the valuer’s dob-in was fair play or overkill? Ever turned a contract trap into treasure? Drop your savvy (or horror) stories below!

Annie Nguyen

Annie Nguyen

Hi, I'm Annie Nguyen. I'm a freelance writer and editor for Daily Highlight with experience across lifestyle, wellness, and personal growth publications. Living in San Francisco gives me endless inspiration, from cozy coffee shop corners to weekend hikes along the coast. Thanks for reading!

Related Posts

Boss Refused To Pay $70K, So This Employee Walked Away With $1.8 Million
Social Issues

Boss Refused To Pay $70K, So This Employee Walked Away With $1.8 Million

4 days ago
Woman Refuses To Let Her Brother Move In After He Once Kicked Her Out—Now Her Family Says She’s Cruel
Social Issues

Woman Refuses To Let Her Brother Move In After He Once Kicked Her Out—Now Her Family Says She’s Cruel

4 months ago
Wife Throws Away Her Husband’s Pot After A Scary Near-Miss With Their Kids
Social Issues

Wife Throws Away Her Husband’s Pot After A Scary Near-Miss With Their Kids

2 months ago
This Dad Backed His Son After He Told a Teacher She Was “Dismissed” at Graduation
Social Issues

This Dad Backed His Son After He Told a Teacher She Was “Dismissed” at Graduation

3 months ago
“She’s Luna, Not Lily”: A Mom Hangs Up When Grandparents Refuse to Call Her Daughter Luna
Social Issues

“She’s Luna, Not Lily”: A Mom Hangs Up When Grandparents Refuse to Call Her Daughter Luna

5 months ago
Woman Calls Out Coworker’s Overstepping, Everyone Has An Opinion
Social Issues

Woman Calls Out Coworker’s Overstepping, Everyone Has An Opinion

8 hours ago

TRENDING

Cousin Demands Woman Rename Her Cat So Baby Can Have The “Dream Name”
Social Issues

Cousin Demands Woman Rename Her Cat So Baby Can Have The “Dream Name”

by Leona Pham
September 30, 2025
0

...

Read more
Retail Worker Outsmarts Manager’s Clock-Out Rule, Earning Extra Cash For Doing Nothing
Social Issues

Retail Worker Outsmarts Manager’s Clock-Out Rule, Earning Extra Cash For Doing Nothing

by Jeffrey Stone
December 3, 2025
0

...

Read more
New Mom Sends Video Of Neglectful Dad To His Mother—Now He’s Crying ‘Betrayal’
Social Issues

New Mom Sends Video Of Neglectful Dad To His Mother—Now He’s Crying ‘Betrayal’

by Annie Nguyen
July 24, 2025
0

...

Read more
She Promised Her Sister Payback if Anyone Wore White – Then It Happened
Social Issues

She Promised Her Sister Payback if Anyone Wore White – Then It Happened

by Sunny Nguyen
August 3, 2025
0

...

Read more
Man Gifts His Sister A Picture Of His Dog After She Gives Him A Tapestry Of Her Kids, Is He In The Wrong?
Social Issues

Man Gifts His Sister A Picture Of His Dog After She Gives Him A Tapestry Of Her Kids, Is He In The Wrong?

by Leona Pham
November 28, 2025
0

...

Read more




Daily Highlight

© 2024 DAILYHIGHLIGHT.COM

Navigate Site

  • About US
  • Contact US
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Policy
  • ADVERTISING POLICY
  • Corrections Policy
  • SYNDICATION
  • Editorial Policy
  • Ethics Policy
  • Fact Checking Policy
  • Sitemap

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • MOVIE
  • TV
  • CELEB
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • MCU
  • DISNEY
  • About US

© 2024 DAILYHIGHLIGHT.COM