A trip to an all-you-can-eat buffet turned into an unexpected social showdown.
To ring in the New Year, one couple hit up a local Chinese buffet with appetites and optimism. When the BBQ short ribs ran out, they saw staff bringing out a fresh tray and positioned themselves to get first dibs. But before OP could grab the tongs, another diner swooped in like it was a drill exercise, grabbing a plate, calling over her (apparent) child, and filling nearly half the tray in one go.
Seeing this, OP made one of those comments that’s usually kept in the “internal commentary” drawer, but he spoke it loud enough to be heard: “Gee I wonder if there will be enough left for everyone else when they’re done.”
The woman did hear it. She got huffy, dumped the tongs back into the pan in a theatrical fashion, and walked off. But what happened next wasn’t about short ribs. It was about social norms, embarrassment, and whether calling out blatant selfishness is rude or necessary.
His girlfriend thinks he crossed a line. Reddit weighed in too.
Now, read the full story:











Everyone has been there in a buffet line, you’re patiently waiting for fresh food, and someone swoops in like they’re on a competitive eating team. The instinct to react is human. OP’s comment may have landed awkwardly, but it came from a place of frustration at blatant selfishness, not malice.
What makes this stick isn’t the ribs but the social unspoken rule: buffets are not “take half the tray and call reinforcements” zones. Most people know this. But when someone breaks that norm and blocks others from their share, tempers can flare.
It’s also understandable that the girlfriend felt embarrassed. Public snarks can feel awkward in the moment, even if they’re justified. But embarrassment shouldn’t shield predatory buffet behavior from gently pointed social correction.
Social norms exist to protect shared spaces. When someone disregards them, a quiet remark can feel like enforcement in real time. The tension here isn’t really about BBQ ribs; it’s about what we tolerate when nobody speaks up.
At the heart of this story is a clash between unspoken etiquette and personal entitlement.
Buffets rely on informal rules of fairness. Social psychologists describe these as shared norms, behaviors that groups implicitly agree make an environment fair and comfortable. When someone takes more than a fair share without regard for others, it breaches that agreement. This often triggers what psychologists call a moral emotion response, a spontaneous feeling that something is “not right.”
According to research in Current Opinion in Psychology, humans evolved to monitor fairness in social groups, and violations can provoke immediate emotional reactions. People express moral emotions like indignation, resentment, or criticism when they perceive unfairness.
That snide remark OP made falls right into that category. It was a quick, reactive comment to a behavior that felt socially unfair.
Experts in social communication emphasize that confrontation strategies can range from assertive to aggressive, and the more direct you are, the more likely you are to provoke a strong emotional response, like the lady dumping the tongs and walking off.
A classic study on conflict communication suggests question framing can reduce defensiveness. For example, saying something like, “Hey, I noticed that tray just came out; mind if I grab a portion too?” can be a way to assert a shared expectation without escalation.
But not all breaches are easily corrected with neutral language. When someone has already ignored basic norms, direct comments, even if slightly sharp, become more likely.
Your girlfriend’s reaction, that she felt embarrassed, taps into another psychological phenomenon: third-party embarrassment. When someone else commits a social breach, bystanders can feel discomfort or social anxiety, even if they agree with the underlying message. This is common in contexts where social harmony is highly valued.
However, embarrassment for someone’s behavior doesn’t necessarily mean the behavior was wrong to call out.
There’s a difference between shaming and calling out unfair behavior. According to conflict resolution experts, calling out a behavior that has real social cost (like monopolizing food meant for others) can be justified, especially when:
-
It affects others’ ability to enjoy a shared resource.
-
The behavior shows disregard for others.
-
Multiple people are impacted.
OP’s comment did exactly that, it highlighted a behavior that was impacting everyone in line.
If you find yourself in a similar situation and want to address it smoothly:
-
Use inclusive language: “Could we make sure everyone gets some?”
-
Appeal to fairness: “Looks like a lot of folks were waiting for this.”
-
Address the person directly but courteously if possible.
These approaches can maintain social norms without escalating to embarrassment or conflict.
This situation isn’t just about ribs. It’s about how we manage shared spaces and how social norms help navigate fairness. When someone blatantly ignores those norms, it’s natural for observers to react, even loudly or awkwardly.
Check out how the community responded:
Many commenters backed OP and said calling out the buffet etiquette breach was justified.





Others emphasized that while better phrasing exists, the core reaction was understandable.



Some comments humorously noted that the lady’s behavior invited the response.


This situation boils down to competing expectations in a shared space. Buffets operate on unspoken rules of fairness, and when someone blatantly prioritizes their own plate over everyone else’s ability to enjoy a fresh tray, it’s natural for observers to react — sometimes awkwardly or loudly.
OP’s comment was snarky, yes. But it wasn’t unfair, and it spoke to a real social breach that impacted more than just one person. Embarrassment in the moment doesn’t equate to wrongdoing, especially when someone’s actions are clearly selfish and disruptive.
So what do you think? Do social norms like buffet etiquette deserve a voice, even if it’s pointed? And how would you have handled seeing someone grab half a fresh tray for themselves?










