Daily Highlight
  • MOVIE
  • TV
  • CELEB
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • MCU
  • DISNEY
  • About US
Daily Highlight
No Result
View All Result

“You Can Keep Your £70k”: Staffer Gets the Ultimate Payback on a Cheap Boss

by Daniel Garcia
January 25, 2026
in Social Issues

There is a certain type of fantasy we all entertain after a bad day at the office. We imagine walking out the door, winning the lottery, and never having to answer another email again. But for some people, the line between workplace fantasy and reality gets very blurry.

A fascinating story resurfaced on Reddit recently about high-stakes finance and even higher-stakes revenge. It involves a tech employee in the late 90s, a very wealthy but stingy boss, and a “forgotten” investment account that turned into a retirement fund. The storyteller claims they were cheated out of a promised commission, so they decided to keep the rest of the winnings for themselves.

It is a tale that dances right on the edge of legal trouble and moral justice. Let us open the file on this financial thriller.

The Story

“You Can Keep Your £70k”: Staffer Gets the Ultimate Payback on a Cheap Boss
Not the actual photo

Short me $70,000 in Violation of our Written Agreement? It'll Cost you $1.8 million?

DISCLAIMER: The names and some of the situations have been changed to protect the identities, but the dollars and general nature of the situation is completely true..

BACKGROUND: A year out of school in the early-1990's, I procured a job as a business analyst for a large, family-owned tech company.

This business was located in the booming heart of technology at the time and was very profitable.

As tech took off over the next decade, the company thrived and remained family-owned. What was a rich family and company became exceedingly wealthy

with a valuation/net worth in the high 9/low 10-figures. The family that owned it was quite n__rotic, very moody and had a reputation as

very ruthless (greedy) when it came to financing, deal-making, employees, etc. I truly believe this is what held them back from ultimately becoming a household

name as a company. As I progressed in the company, I gained more and more face time with the owners.

I worked on some projects directly with ownership that really paid off and gained me even greater access to their inner circle.

Now, like a lot of people at the time and particularly those who worked in tech, I was heavily invested in tech stocks.

I discussed some of my investments and gains with ownership as casual conversation, though investing had nothing to do with my role in the

company. That is until one day in late-1999 when the owner came to me and asked me if I would invest some of his

personal money. He wanted me to take big risks to see if they would pay off using 1 million dollars of his personal money.

I was a bit hesitant, but still being in my late-20's and wanting to prove myself, I said I would.

I asked for a written agreement where they acknowledged this wasn't my role in the company, was a personal matter between the owner and

me, and to document my compensation for this side arrangement (20% of all profits). Around this same time and by working in the

industry I started to notice the weakness associated with a lot of tech companies. They just weren't living up to their hype and stock

price and some seemed like they were starting to run out of money. I had no inside information, just a strong sense of which

companies were struggling based on my work in the business. Based on this sense I started using both my money and the owners

money to short tech companies just after the New Year in 2000. For anyone unfamiliar with shorting, it means if the value of a

stock decreases, the value of the investment increases. I had a few long positions, but my overall position was very short.

Since the owner wanted big risk and big reward, I used his money and obtained leverage or margin from the financial institution where

I maintained both his and my trading accounts. The accounts were separate, but both under my name (again, I documented this and gained

consent). Well, both my account and his suffered some moderate losses in the first two months of 2000 before the bubble began to

burst and both accounts, but his in particular, began to skyrocket.. OWNERSHIP'S PETTINESS In June, the company began to suffer a downturn.

We were still profitable, but since we provided tech services and products we were not immune to weakness in the broader market.

I had not informed the owner of my short strategy. He came to me one day and asked how his money was doing,

saying he suspected it was way down like the general market. To his surprise, I informed him that while we still had some

money tied up in options (puts) and shorts, but based on the positions I had closed, there was $1.35 million in cash

sitting in the account that belonged to him. Again, I still had a bunch of open positions which, if memory serves,

were worth about a million on that date, but the positions I had closed had yielded $1.35 million in cash just sitting

in his account (which was in my name). The owner, either through ignorance or lack of attention, said "Great, $1.35 million.

Fantastic work in this down market. Will you please wire it to me?" I responded that I would, but would be

taking my 20% of the $350,000 profit, or $70,000, before wiring him the $280,000. I also reminded him I still

had open positions that had yet to pay off or close, but I didn't state the amount. He, once again, appeared

not to understand or comprehend the open positions statement, but instead totally focused on and became incensed about my rightful claim

for $70,000. He went on and on about how times were tough, I should be grateful for a job, particularly at my

young age, and the entire $350,000 was necessary for him and the company. I knew this wasn't true based on

my position within the company. Worse, this was my first time personally experiencing the greedy and corrupt nature that served as the

basis for ownership's reputation.. THE REVENGE Now comes the revenge. Since, after two separate conversations, the owner didn't seem to

grasp that the open positions would yield at least some income, and thus additional profit, I decided not to mention it again.

I sent him back the entire $1.35 million and continued to manage the open positions to the best of my ability.

And here's the kicker, the owner never brought it up again. He seemed to think the $1.35 million payment was the

entire value of the account and never understood or remembered that open positions still existed. He never asked for records, tax documents

or any time of audit or financials. Given the fact that he was dishonest with me, I didn't feel the need

to disabuse him of that notion. Ultimately, after a bit more net gain, I covered all of the shorts and exercised

all of the options (puts in this case) for an additional $1.8 million. I worked for the company for 3 more

years and owner never asked about it during my tenure, after I gave notice, or since. I know it's a bit

crass and even shady af, but given his dishonesty with me over the $70,000, I felt justified in keeping the additional

$1.8 million. I paid taxes on the gain (long term cap gain), and went on my way with a fantastic nest

egg. Nobody has asked about it since and I have only told the story to a few people (and even then

only after the statute of limitations passed). The final ironic cherry on top of this sundae is that during my

remaining 3 years I gained greater influence with ownership in position within the company because they considered me loyal for giving

the $1.35 million back and not making too much of a stink about the $70,000 profit. Little did they know I

got the better of them. The company eventually folded due to family disputes, but my understanding is that ownership walked away

in very good financial position. They likely could have been a much better and greater company had they not practiced the

same dishonesty that they showed me with their vendors, clients and employees.. Thanks for reading and hope you enjoyed.

Okay, we really need to pause and process the sheer scale of this story. Most office pettiness involves stealing a stapler or taking an extra long lunch break. Walking away with nearly two million dollars is in a completely different galaxy. It feels like the plot of a Hollywood heist movie.

I admit, part of me wants to high-five the OP for outsmarting a greedy boss. It is satisfying to see someone refuse to be bullied. However, my anxiety is also through the roof just reading about the legal risks. It is a wild reminder that sometimes the biggest secrets are kept by the people sitting right next to us in the cubicle.

Expert Opinion

This story touches on a concept psychologists call the “Psychological Contract.” This is the unwritten set of expectations between an employer and an employee. When an employer breaks this trust—like refusing to pay a promised commission—it can trigger intense feelings of betrayal.

Research from the Journal of Applied Psychology indicates that when employees feel “morally injured” by a boss, they are significantly more likely to engage in “counterproductive work behavior.” This can range from working slower to, in extreme cases, finding ways to reclaim what they believe they are owed.

Dr. Paul White, a psychologist and workplace expert, notes that financial appreciation is a primary language of respect in business. “When an agreement is violated, the employee no longer views the relationship as a partnership,” he explains. “They view it as a conflict zone where they must protect their own interests.”

In this specific case, the OP rationalized their actions as a form of “evening the score.” While the legality is certainly questionable, the psychology is clear. The boss’s greed created a vacuum of loyalty. When you treat people as disposable, you lose the right to expect their honesty in return.

Community Opinions

The comment section turned into a heated debate room. Readers were torn between cheering for the “little guy” and pointing out that this sounded a lot like a crime or a work of fiction.

Some users cheered for the financial revenge.
[Reddit User] − That’s why you don’t s__ew over people handling your money for you

Okami512 − Morally I don't see an issue with this one. Could view it as a mutually dissolving the agreement...

The party who the funds belonged to was notified of the open options and chose not to pursue them.

[Reddit User] − He's just a regular person that got opportunity to make money like a millionaire...

Why should I take side of a greedy millionaire? OP just did what should be possible for everyone.

Many readers suspected the story was made up.
NessieReddit − Why would you put ANY of this in your name as that makes you liable for all taxes?

This doesn't add up... OP is 100% full of s__t. He goes from late 30s, to early 40s, to mid 30s... OP is a chronic bullshitter.

rubberducky_93 − Only 3 days in the new year, that's a very early harvest from the karma farm

[Reddit User] − Based on OP's posting history, I'm 99% sure this (and every other post) is just creative writing...

Nobody has this many crazy stories that don't mesh with each other...

Others questioned the legality of the move.
limbodog − How is this not embezzlement? Or am I missing something?

Lokismoke − The original OP just embezzelled money, which isn't really malicious compliance.

unicorn8dragon − There are a lot of laws and rules around investment advising...

it’s always going to be murky and especially if it’s a personal or professional relationship.

How to Navigate a Situation Like This

If you ever find yourself in a situation where a boss or client refuses to pay you what was promised, please do not follow the OP’s example. “Self-help” remedies, like keeping company assets or funds, can land you in serious legal trouble. You want to be the plaintiff in a lawsuit, not the defendant.

The best first step is to refer back to your written agreement. Keep a paper trail of every conversation. If the amount is significant, a consultation with an employment lawyer is worth the investment.

Often, a firm letter from an attorney is enough to remind a greedy employer of their obligations. It is better to fight for your money through the proper channels. That way, you can enjoy your earnings without looking over your shoulder for decades.

Conclusion

This story serves as a wild example of what happens when greed meets opportunity. The boss tried to save a few thousand dollars and ended up losing a fortune because of his own negligence. Whether fact or fiction, it is a cautionary tale about the cost of dishonesty.

Do you think the OP was justified in keeping the money, or was this plain theft? How would you handle a boss who refused to honor a written contract? We would love to hear your take on this high-stakes drama.

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THIS STORY?

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THIS STORY?

OP Is Not The AH (NTA) 0/0 votes | 0%
OP Is Definitely The AH (YTA) 0/0 votes | 0%
No One Is The AH Here (NAH) 0/0 votes | 0%
Everybody Sucks Here (ESH) 0/0 votes | 0%
Need More INFO (INFO) 0/0 votes | 0%

Daniel Garcia

Daniel Garcia

Daniel is a contributing writer for DAILY HIGHLIGHT. Daniel is a New York-based author and has written for publications such as AUBTU Today, Digital Trends, Magazine, and many other media outlets.

Related Posts

Sister Furious After Brother Lends Her Expensive Makeup To His Girlfriend Without Asking
Social Issues

Sister Furious After Brother Lends Her Expensive Makeup To His Girlfriend Without Asking

4 weeks ago
Customers Yell At Teen Barista, So She Pretends To Get Fired To Calm Them—Was It Wrong?
Social Issues

Customers Yell At Teen Barista, So She Pretends To Get Fired To Calm Them—Was It Wrong?

2 months ago
Man’s Plan To Surprise His Wife With A Coldplay Concert At Home: Heartwarming Or Heartbreaking?
Social Issues

Man’s Plan To Surprise His Wife With A Coldplay Concert At Home: Heartwarming Or Heartbreaking?

5 months ago
Man Sends His Homeless Brother To Florida With A One-Way Ticket Instead Of Taking Him Into His Home, Wonders If He’s Wrong
Social Issues

Man Sends His Homeless Brother To Florida With A One-Way Ticket Instead Of Taking Him Into His Home, Wonders If He’s Wrong

6 months ago
Mom Blames Birthday Host For “Making” Her Kid Cry Over Losing A Game
Social Issues

Mom Blames Birthday Host For “Making” Her Kid Cry Over Losing A Game

4 months ago
She Left Her Sister-in-Law’s House Mid-Visit After Realizing ‘Support’ Meant Free Childcare During Her Grief
Social Issues

She Left Her Sister-in-Law’s House Mid-Visit After Realizing ‘Support’ Meant Free Childcare During Her Grief

5 months ago

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

POST

Email me new posts

Email me new comments

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

TRENDING

Bride Sends Friend Vomit Video After She Demands “Proof” Fiancé Is Sick
Social Issues

Bride Sends Friend Vomit Video After She Demands “Proof” Fiancé Is Sick

by Layla Bui
September 22, 2025
0

...

Read more
Supernatural Star Jensen Ackles Almost Landed Roles As Deadpool And Hawkeye
MOVIE

Supernatural Star Jensen Ackles Almost Landed Roles As Deadpool And Hawkeye

by Marry Anna
April 17, 2024
0

...

Read more
Her Parents Adopted Her Child, Then Asked Her to Help Raise Him
Social Issues

Her Parents Adopted Her Child, Then Asked Her to Help Raise Him

by Believe Johnson
January 3, 2026
0

...

Read more
Man Spent Months Fighting To Adopt His Stepdaughter—Now His Wife Admits She’s Divorcing Him After It’s Finalized
Social Issues

Man Spent Months Fighting To Adopt His Stepdaughter—Now His Wife Admits She’s Divorcing Him After It’s Finalized

by Annie Nguyen
August 6, 2025
0

...

Read more
Woman Refuses to Pay Vet Bill After Dog Eats Chocolate—Even Though It Was Her Fault
Social Issues

Woman Refuses to Pay Vet Bill After Dog Eats Chocolate—Even Though It Was Her Fault

by Annie Nguyen
July 24, 2025
0

...

Read more




Daily Highlight

© 2024 DAILYHIGHLIGHT.COM

Navigate Site

  • About US
  • Contact US
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Policy
  • ADVERTISING POLICY
  • Corrections Policy
  • SYNDICATION
  • Editorial Policy
  • Ethics Policy
  • Fact Checking Policy
  • Sitemap

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • MOVIE
  • TV
  • CELEB
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • MCU
  • DISNEY
  • About US

© 2024 DAILYHIGHLIGHT.COM