Did Maximus actually exist?
Filmmakers have always been enamored with the culture and civilization of prehistoric Rome, and this love helped create several Hollywood’s Golden Age epics. The monumental grandeur of Rome’s influence on the prehistoric community served as a constant wellspring of inventiveness for the magnificent spectacle that they could offer, as shown in Biblical classics and movies such as Ben-Hur. The peplum genre of films and the craze for Rome appear to have vanished with the Hollywood Golden Age, but Ridley Scott’s Gladiator (2000), which won the Academy Awards for Best Picture, stands out with respect to that. With 5 Academy Award nominations and a 2nd-place spot in the box office, Gladiator was ranked among the exceptional movies that received praise from audiences and critics alike.
As films such as Alexander and Troy later attempted to recreate Gladiator’s achievements, the narrative of the dishonored Roman general seeking revenge against the dominant emperor stirred the emotions of viewers and, if only slightly, temporarily, revoked the passion with prehistoric classics back to the cinema. Its effects have lasted so long that the director has made the decision to revisit the Gladiator saga on his own. Like any engrossing historical movie, this one’s popularity with reviewers and viewers frequently encourages a broader engrossment in the original source material. An issue about historical accuracy unavoidably emerges, particularly for a film that centers on Roman politics, and how people, including the rulers and slaves lived. Belows are 5 of the movie’s most important components, together with the historical predecessors to aid in answering that query.
1. Marcus Aurelius
The historical backdrop of the featured context, at least in terms of imperial succession, was among the issues followed very closely by the movie. Commodus, the son of Marcus Aurelius, also the one to succeed him to sit on the throne, ushered in a much more corrupt era than that of his father. The realm was rightly administered by Marcus Aurelius, brilliant author and Stoic theorist, and Commodus took a distasteful detour from his dad’s capable leadership. While the film accurately portrays Commodus and Marcus Aurelius in a number of ways, one of the story’s central tenets is in stark contrast to historical fact. The real-life account is more dismal and less dramatic, whereas the movie has Commodus killing his father against his wishes in order to succeed Maximus as emperor.
The “Five Good Emperors” whose rules are regarded as the pinnacle of the Roman Empire’s wealth and solidity, included Aurelius as its final member. Along with ensuring nearly one hundred years of imperial wealth, the squad of Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, and Marcus Aurelius also would have completed an epic heavy metal band. The fact that not one of those rulers handed down the throne to a natural-born child and rather chose to promote someone who had proven himself to be a capable leader, up until Marcus Aurelius, was among the causes of their achievements.
Regardless of the pile of evidence warning him that Commodus had approximately the same chance of running an empire effectively as he did a lunar module, Aurelius in fact surrendered the empire to his son. Marcus Aurelius evidently never wanted to unexpectedly transfer power to somebody else as he became older and granted his absolutely incompetent son more and more authority.
Gladiator’s protagonist, the dishonored general Maximus Decimus Meridius, portrayed by Russell Crowe, who battles his way up through the gladiator ranks in order to win the hearts of the Roman populace and pose a danger to the emperor who initially attempted to mess up his life.
He almost organizes a revolt against Commodus, then murders the despised emperor before succumbing to his injuries. In comparison to Marcus Aurelius and Commodus, the historical precedent for Maximus’ character isn’t close to being clear. In the same way that Russell Crower’s character fought the emperor and oversaw the Roman soldiers, no Maximus ever existed at all. That doesn’t imply, though, that the general was wholly made up.
Maximus, despite not accurately imitating any of the ancient champions of Roman chronicle and legend, integrates into the part of several of them. He resembles the unwaveringly virtuous prehistoric Roman commander Cincinatus in a number of aspects, who, in accordance with customs, was given absolute power by Rome in a moment of crisis. While cultivating his farms, Cincinatus received word of his appointment and was granted a period of 6 months.
He abandoned his plough, swiftly abdicated power, and went back to his fields after saving the Roman Republic. The general Clodius Albinus offers a different, more obvious historical comparison to Maximus. He was a Commodus contemporaneous man serving in the province of Britannia who protested the emperor’s overindulgence and bemoaned the truth that the emperor had been given absolute power instead of the senate and the public. He ascended as a contender to Commodus and eventually engaged in a fierce conflict with Septimius Severus, the new emperor, for the future of the empire, where he was unluckily vanquished.
3. Commodus in the Arena
In both historical record and the movie, Commodus was completely different from his admired father and put little effort in enhancing his fame and honor through his public or private behavior. He separated himself from the 5 Good Emperors in a number of regrettable ways, including by establishing a personality cult in which he was revered as a deity, ceremonially renaming Rome “Commodiana” and renaming all months of the Roman calendar after his own titles – but thankfully without designating any of them as “megalomania” His presence at the Colosseum, however, may have been his most detestable habit.
What appears in the film as Commodus’ culminating decision to challenge Maximus in the arena was in reality a distressingly typical event. Commodus enjoyed to be presented as a gladiator in bouts that were predetermined in some manners, and it wasn’t impracticable for him to injure his rivals prior to the combat, as is depicted in the film. As emperor, he exacted a million sesterces from Rome for each appearance for killing wild animals and beating cripples to death. Gladiatorial displays were viewed as improper for everybody of the upper class, and of course particularly for an emperor, as they frequently featured slaves and the convicted.
4. Commodus’ Death
While Commodus, as portrayed by Joaquin Phoenix, was undoubtedly a self-obsessed emperor in accordance with chronicle accounts, the actual circumstances of his passing differed significantly from those depicted in the movie. What actually occurred was that a lot of influential individuals realized that instead of letting Commodus execute the plan to decorate his garden with their decapitated heads, chose to keep them attached on the top of their body, and they didn’t want their heads be served as the main course in Commodus’ own rendition of “The Red Wedding” Those guys managed to bribe Commodus’ coach in wrestling, a gladiator under the name of Narcissus, to choke the emperor in his bath.
Midway through filming, Ridley Scott changed the film’s conclusion, yet he rightly decided not to include this sequence since two nude men falling and flailing around in a bath doesn’t look so dramatic when the resolution viewers ultimately come to see it.
5. The Fate of the Republic
Rome made an effort to alter after Commodus died, but his rule’s outcome wasn’t almost as promising as the film would make you believe. As Marcus Aurelius of the film seems to have in mind, Rome never returned to being a Republic; the slim chance of doing so was put to rest with Clodius Albinus’ failure in the decades after Commodus’ passing. Rome had difficulties despite the senate’s “Damnatio Memoriae” declaration against Commodus, which called for the destruction of all sculptures and images of the emperor. Following Commodus’ passing, there was a great deal of political turbulence, adn in the next year alone, Rome had five different emperors in power. In the end, the emperors’ reign persisted for centuries more.
Gladiator’s ability to play with the concepts and narratives found in the chronicle account of Rome itself may be its biggest influence. The film has several references to Roman legend and chronicle, which, although by no means a direct historical rendition, add a layer of believability to the narrative and support its concepts and ideas. While the film’s version of history may not be accurate, the plot itself is based on some of the most important tales that the Romans would have acknowledged and adored. Myths and chronicles are entwined, and the movie’s popularity proves that the concept was a good one.
Maybe you like: