It’s one thing to hold employees accountable, but it’s another to punish them for something as minor as a single bad day after years of stellar performance. Micromanaging in this way doesn’t just crush morale, it can change how people approach their work entirely.
For one man, a frustrating meeting with his manager became the turning point. Instead of recognition for handling demanding cases day after day, he was treated like a liability because of a shortfall of just one task. From then on, he stopped giving his best and began doing only what was required. His company may have thought they won by enforcing the rules, but what followed proved the opposite.
A Reddit user explained how his company required 40 cases resolved per day















Some companies rely on toxic productivity metrics. According to Gallup’s State of the Global Workplace report, only 21% of employees feel engaged at work, and punitive systems are one reason why.
Dr. Steven Rogelberg, an organizational psychologist, notes that “When organizations measure only outputs, they risk demoralizing their most engaged employees, leading to disengagement or attrition.”
Here, the company’s obsession with “40 per day” ignored context: sickness, case complexity, and the fact that he was outperforming everyone else by a mile. By punishing him, they sent a clear message: extra effort doesn’t matter. That’s why he stopped giving it.
Sociologists even have a name for this: “work-to-rule.” It’s when employees follow every rule to the letter, often slowing productivity, to protest unfair treatment.
The UK has seen waves of it, particularly in education and healthcare. Ironically, it often reveals how much workplaces depend on employees going “above and beyond” without compensation.
The lesson? If companies want loyalty, they need to recognize and reward consistency, not punish one-off dips. Otherwise, they risk turning their stars into silent rebels.
Here’s what the community had to contribute:
Redditors joked that the employee was simply following the training to “reach 40”


One user noted the HR trainers couldn’t answer real-case questions because they’d never done the job themselves

Others shared similar horror stories






















So, what do you think? Was he justified in dialing his work back to the bare minimum, or should he have kept overachieving despite the lack of recognition? And more importantly, have you ever been punished for doing “too little” after years of giving too much? Share your stories below.






