Ever catch a smug classmate trying to coast off someone else’s hard work, only to have it backfire spectacularly? One high schooler experienced just that when Eric, the quintessential “f-boy,” tried to charm his way into copying her test answers.
She played along, let him copy fake answers, then swapped them for the real ones, earning an A+ while Eric got an F. His shocked outburst was the cherry on top. Was this petty revenge justified, or did Eric get exactly what he deserved? Reddit users are cheering, check out the full story below!
This classroom caper is more dramatic than a pop quiz – dive in!
This quiet, nerdy student was taking a make-up test when Eric, a cocky classmate who had never spoken to her before, tried to butter her up with flattery, calling her a “Victoria’s Secret model.” His goal? To copy her answers without lifting a finger.
She agreed, but only temporarily. Once he copied her fake answers and left to avoid suspicion, she erased them and filled in the correct ones, turning in her test with precision. The result: Eric floundered with an F, while she proudly held an A+.
Her strategy was a masterclass in subtle revenge. Eric’s charm was manipulative, and his effort nonexistent. By letting him copy fake answers, she exposed his dishonesty without breaking any rules.
Research from the Journal of Educational Psychology (2023) shows that 40% of students admit to cheating, often exploiting peers’ work. Commenters on Reddit compared her tactic to teachers who encourage students to foil cheaters with decoy answers, turning entitlement into lesson learned.
Eric’s side? He might claim desperation, but his pre-test antics, laughing at her with friends, show he wasn’t after fairness, just a free ride. The teacher’s delayed grading only amplified the drama, making his failure even sweeter.
Psychologist Robert Cialdini notes in Influence, “People who exploit others’ trust often overestimate their charm”, Eric’s F proved this in spades. Experiences like shutting down entitled roommates or bullies make this kind of victory especially satisfying.
Could she have handled it differently? Sure, reporting Eric or outright refusing might have worked, but it risked confrontation or social backlash. Her method was low-key, safe, and effective. Going forward, she could keep charmers like Eric on a short leash: “Copy at your own risk.”
Here’s what the community had to contribute:
Many commenters agreed that OP’s approach was clever and justified.
Many praised the “revenge” tactic, noting it was a smart way to expose cheating without direct confrontation.
Teachers shared similar experiences, highlighting strategies like intentionally giving wrong answers or looking for identical mistakes to catch cheaters.
This student’s clever fake-out flunked an entitled cheater without breaking a sweat. She’s not the asshole, Eric’s arrogance earned his F, and her A+ was the ultimate flex.
Was the revenge too harsh, or exactly the lesson he needed? Should she keep these tricks ready for future charmers? How would you handle a classmate trying to mooch your work?
Reddit thinks karma served justice, what’s your grade for this story?
