A Redditor’s nightmare didn’t end with the wedding, it started when she got home.
A young woman joined a wedding party expecting joy, dancing and celebration. Instead, she ended up with an empty stomach, a bottomless supply of drinks and a blackout that swallowed entire hours of her night.
Her boyfriend arrived later, irritated by how drunk she became. He drove her home while she threw up three times. She could barely walk, talk or drink water. When she finally collapsed into bed, she expected rest, not confusion about what happened next.
Now she remembers fragments. Being rolled onto her back. Feeling someone climb on top of her. Taking her shirt off but not knowing why. Waking up alone with her door unlocked. And a boyfriend who acted annoyed the next morning rather than concerned.
Her mind keeps circling back to one question. Was this normal relationship behavior, or something far more alarming?
Now, read the full story:

















This story hits in the gut because it shows how quickly trust can shatter. Many people have been in OP’s position, where alcohol blurs memory and leaves only fragments behind. That fog creates doubt, fear and the awful question: “Did something happen to me, or did I overreact?”
But the emotional weight is real. She asked for care, and instead she got abandonment. Her body was limp, her mind scattered and her boyfriend chose intimacy instead of safety. He left her with no water, no help and an unlocked door.
This feeling of isolation is textbook for trauma, and it explains why so many readers responded with alarm.
Now let’s look at this through expert eyes.
The core issue here is consent, intoxication and partner responsibility.
To evaluate what happened, experts commonly look at three key areas. Mental capacity, physical capability and power balance. Each helps determine whether someone can consent.
OP describes vomiting repeatedly, losing coordination, being unable to drink water and blacking out. According to the CDC, these are all markers of “incapacitation,” which makes consent impossible.
RAINN, the largest anti-violence organization in the United States, states clearly that a person who is incapacitated due to alcohol cannot legally or ethically consent.
OP’s boyfriend also physically repositioned her. That means he understood she lacked control of her own body. It signals awareness, not ignorance.
His behavior after the act also matters. He left immediately. He did not check on her. He did not bring water. He left her door unlocked.
These are not signs of care. They are signs of detachment and, in some cases, punishment. Many abusive dynamics involve withholding comfort after intimacy or using someone’s vulnerable state to assert control.
An expert from LoveIsRespect.org, a national relationship advice organization, says, “A partner who respects boundaries will prioritize your wellbeing over their own desires. If they do not, this is a warning sign of unhealthy behavior.”
When OP confronted him, he minimized the situation by reframing it as embarrassment over her drinking. This tactic aligns with what psychologists call DARVO: Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender. First coined by Dr. Jennifer Freyd, it describes abusers who shift blame onto the victim.
OP’s boyfriend denied wrongdoing. He attacked her for being drunk. He reversed the blame by saying he only did it because she asked him to cuddle.
This fits the model precisely.
Research from the Journal of Interpersonal Violence also shows that partners who take advantage of intoxicated individuals often rely on previous intimacy to rationalize their actions later.
He likely leaned on the idea that “we’re a couple so it’s fine,” even though experts emphasize that relationships do not override impaired consent.
A healthy partner’s response that night would have looked very different. Professionals in the field consistently recommend the following.
Offer water. Help them change into comfortable clothes. Make sure they sleep safely on their side. Stay with them until they stabilize. Avoid all forms of intimacy until they sober up.
OP received none of these.
The final layer is safety. Leaving the door unlocked shows disregard for her physical security. Someone severely intoxicated cannot defend themselves. Any partner who cares would make sure the home stays secure.
So what should OP do?
Experts recommend grounding techniques, writing down memory fragments, and speaking with a therapist trained in trauma or relationship harm. She should also avoid confronting him alone if she feels unsafe.
The core message is this. OP’s fear is not irrational. Her instincts flagged danger because something dangerous happened. When someone’s partner takes advantage of them at their most vulnerable moment, the harm goes beyond physical boundaries. It affects trust, identity and emotional stability.
OP deserves clarity, safety and support. She does not need to carry confusion alone.
Check out how the community responded:
Many commenters pointed out the power imbalance, her incapacitated state and the boyfriend’s decision to proceed anyway. They said the pattern looked like violation, not miscommunication.





A different group focused on his cold behavior, like leaving her unlocked in the apartment. They said even without the intimacy, this would be a huge relationship red flag.



These commenters pushed OP to take action because they believed the behavior would escalate.


Stories like this highlight how confusing moments become when alcohol distorts memory. OP is trying to piece together fragments while her body remembers more than her mind wants to accept.
But what stands out is her boyfriend’s choice. He saw her vomiting, disoriented, barely conscious and physically powerless. Instead of stepping into the role of caretaker, he stepped into the role of someone who wanted something from her.
The next morning he gave her no comfort, no reassurance and no honesty. He offered only blame.
Many readers recognized the pattern instantly because they have seen these dynamics before. It rarely gets better without serious intervention. OP’s instincts pushed her to ask the internet because part of her already knows something crossed a line.
So, what do you think? Does this look like a moment of poor judgment, or was her boyfriend taking advantage of a vulnerable partner? If you were in OP’s position, what would your next step be?








