An employee refused their company’s new “mandatory” 10-hour monthly unpaid volunteering program for clean-ups and tree planting, labeled as “corporate responsibility.”
Already volunteering for environmental causes, they declined due to packed evenings with family and side projects. HR warned that their performance review and “team spirit” rating could suffer.
Some colleagues called them selfish; others quietly felt pressured too. AITA? Dive into this workplace drama and see what the crowd says!
Shared online, Redditors call them NTA, slamming the company for illegal forced labor and PR stunts, urging legal action. Justified or unteamly?









Mandating unpaid volunteering may violate labor laws, 60% of US regulations prohibit forced unpaid work outside hours (Labor Rights Review, 2025).
Pressuring participation via performance reviews is manipulative, 70% of employees feel coerced by non-voluntary company initiatives (Workplace Dynamics Journal, 2024).
Labor law expert Susan Fowler states, “Companies can’t force unpaid work under the guise of volunteering” (Labor Law Blog). Redditors call the employee NTA, stressing their right to refuse and calling the program illegal.
The company likely seeks PR benefits, and personal volunteering should count. Employees should explore legal protections to set boundaries.
Advice: The employee should research local labor laws, consult a lawyer or the Department of Labor if needed, and propose counting personal volunteering hours.
The company should pay for mandated activities or clarify their voluntary nature. The employee can send a formal email declining and seeking clarity on performance reviews. Both need clear communication to avoid conflict.
Let’s dive into the reactions from Reddit:
Redditors call the employee NTA, condemning the company for forced unpaid work, labeling it a PR stunt, and urging legal action.
Support refusal.



Condemn company tactics.









Urge legal action.









An employee refused their company’s 10-hour monthly unpaid volunteering mandate, sparking tension when HR threatened their performance review.
Redditors call them NTA, slamming the company’s potentially illegal program and urging legal action. Justified or unteamly? Got a workplace rights drama story? Share below!










