Coworker Refuses To Use Colleague’s Real Name, Gets Fired After Ignored During Work Trip

Workplace conflicts are often about power, boundaries, and how people choose to treat one another. Sometimes the issue is not about job performance at all but about basic manners and whether someone believes they are above them.

This situation centers on a senior employee who has spent years building trust at his office, only to have a new hire dismiss him with the wrong name over and over again. Despite multiple corrections and clear instructions, the behavior continues, seemingly as a joke.

When the employee finally decides to stop engaging altogether, an unexpected request puts that decision to the test. What happens next involves missed calls, angry messages, and a confrontation that draws management in fast. Scroll down to find out how Reddit reacted and who they thought was really at fault.

A new employee repeatedly refuses to use a coworker’s correct name

Being addressed by one’s name is a basic form of respect, especially in professional settings where identity and credibility matter. When that recognition is deliberately withheld, it can feel dismissive and undermining.

In this story, the conflict didn’t begin with a missed ride or an argument; it began with a repeated refusal to acknowledge someone’s identity. Both individuals entered the situation carrying emotional weight: one trying to establish boundaries, the other seemingly intent on pushing them.

At the emotional core, the OP wasn’t reacting to a single incident but to a pattern of intentional disrespect. Despite clear corrections and reinforcement from supervisors, the coworker continued to use the wrong name, turning it into mockery.

Psychologically, repeated misnaming can trigger feelings of invisibility and loss of control. The OP’s warning, followed by silence, was not impulsive retaliation but a boundary drawn after months of disregard.

The coworker’s motivation appeared rooted in entitlement, assuming access to favors and attention without offering basic respect in return.

When the situation is viewed through the lens of dominance behavior rather than simple immaturity. While many might interpret the coworker’s actions as teasing, behavioral psychology suggests repeated misnaming can function as a subtle power play.

New employees who feel insecure may attempt to elevate themselves by diminishing others, particularly senior colleagues. By refusing to respond, the OP disrupted that dynamic.

The silence removed the reinforcement the coworker sought: control, reaction, and attention, exposing how dependent his behavior was on provocation.

Clinical psychologist Dr. Karyn Hall has written extensively about the importance of setting and maintaining personal boundaries. Research and expert commentary in the field of interpersonal psychology make a similar point: when limits are repeatedly ignored, it can escalate conflict and misunderstanding.

As one expert review notes, “Ignoring your ‘no,’ doing the opposite of what you asked, and mocking your requests are signs your boundaries are being violated.”

This highlights that persistent disrespect for boundaries, especially after they’ve been clearly communicated, creates emotional tension that observers may misinterpret as overreaction, even though the responsibility lies with the person continuing the behavior.

This insight directly applies to the outcome of the story. The OP did not cause the coworker to lose his job. The termination resulted from the coworker’s own emails, threats, and emotional escalation, documented evidence of harassment.

The rain, the cab fare, and the frustration were unfortunate, but they stemmed from assumptions the coworker had no authority to make. A personal favor was demanded, not requested, from someone he had repeatedly disrespected.

These are the responses from Reddit users:

These commenters emphasized basic respect and personal accountability

This group framed the outcome as predictable consequences

Users focused on how misnaming equals disrespect, not humor

These commenters questioned the coworker’s entitlement

This story resonated because it highlights how “small” behaviors can reveal big problems. Some readers felt sympathy for the stranded coworker; others saw a clear case of someone ignoring warnings until consequences arrived.

Was ignoring the coworker the right move, or should the issue have been escalated earlier? And where should workplaces draw the line between patience and professionalism? Share your thoughts below, because respect at work starts with the basics.