There are two rules in most households that are usually written in stone: Don’t hit children, and don’t hurt animals.
But what happens when those two rules collide in a split second of violence?
One teenager recently found themselves in the middle of a massive family implosion after their 9-year-old cousin, angry about being denied video game time, decided to take his frustration out on the household pet. The teen’s reaction was instant, physical, and controversial.
Now, the family is divided, and the internet is asking a dark question: Is this child’s behavior a tantrum, or a warning sign of something much worse?
Now, read the full story:










!["He Could Have Killed Her": Family Fights After Girl Hit Her Cousin for Abusing Her Pet but I honestly believe he could have seriously injured or killed my cat. Am I the [jerk]?](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/wp-editor-1763896955895-9.webp)
This is a nightmare scenario where instinct overrides etiquette.
Let’s be clear: hitting a child is almost never the answer. It creates fear rather than understanding. However, the OP wasn’t acting as a disciplinarian; they were acting as a protector. When we see a defenseless loved one (and pets are loved ones) being physically attacked, the brain skips the “rational thought” queue and goes straight to “eliminate threat.”
The uncle’s reaction is arguably more disturbing than the slap. Dismissing a 9-year-old kicking an animal as “just frustration” is a massive failure in parenting. A toddler might pull a tail out of curiosity; a 9-year-old knows that kicking causes pain. By focusing on the slap rather than the animal abuse, the uncle is sweeping a massive red flag under the rug.
Expert Opinion
This incident touches on a frightening intersection of child development and psychology.
While society rightfully condemns physical discipline of children, psychology takes a very dim view of intentional animal cruelty in older children. According to Dr. Joni Johnston, a clinical psychologist writing for Psychology Today, acts of violence against animals by children older than six can be a significant “red flag.”
Unlike a toddler who might play too rough, a 9-year-old understands that animals feel pain. Kicking a cat because he was denied the Xbox is an example of Instrumental Aggression, using violence as a tool to vent anger or regain a sense of control.
Research supports the community’s dark concerns. A study cited by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) notes that approximately 25% of children diagnosed with Conduct Disorder display cruelty to animals. This doesn’t mean the cousin is a “serial killer” (the “Macdonald Triad” is a bit outdated and nuanced), but it does mean he lacks appropriate emotional regulation and empathy.
If this behavior isn’t corrected immediately with professional intervention (not just a “talking to”), it can escalate. The OP’s slap, while legally risky, stopped the immediate violence. The real danger now is the uncle ignoring the psychology behind his son’s kick.
Check out how the community responded:
The majority of the community felt that the cat’s safety trumped the child’s comfort. For many, violence against a pet breaks the social contract protecting the child.



A significant number of users saw the kicking not just as bad behavior, but as a pathopsychological symptom.
!["He Could Have Killed Her": Family Fights After Girl Hit Her Cousin for Abusing Her Pet cammyboy1980 - NTA - Kids that hurt animals grow up to be serial killers.[1]](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/wp-editor-1763896805337-1.webp)


Some users acknowledged that hitting a child is generally wrong, but felt the circumstances (defense of a third party) justified it.
!["He Could Have Killed Her": Family Fights After Girl Hit Her Cousin for Abusing Her Pet FloppyEaredDog - I’m against hitting kids... but I can’t bring myself to call you an [jerk]. Kicking a helpless animal is wrong, you probably acted instinctively... Factor in your age,...](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/wp-editor-1763896796443-1.webp)


Users pointed the finger squarely at the uncle for raising a child who thinks violence is an acceptable reaction to “no.”
!["He Could Have Killed Her": Family Fights After Girl Hit Her Cousin for Abusing Her Pet [Reddit User] - Why are Toms parents raising a piece of [trash] is my only question?](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/wp-editor-1763896777426-1.webp)

How to Navigate Family Violence and Pets
If you are in a situation where a family member (child or adult) harms your pet:
-
Immediate Separation: The child cannot be in the same room as the animal, period. If the family visits, the cat goes into a locked bedroom. Do not trust “promises” to behave.
-
Vet Check: As one commenter noted, cats hide pain. A kick could cause internal bleeding or a ruptured bladder. Get the cat checked and send the bill to the uncle. This establishes real-world consequences.
-
Address the Uncle: You need to have a calm but firm conversation with the adults. “I apologize for slapping him; I reacted out of fear. However, your son violently attacked a defenseless animal because he couldn’t play video games. That is a dangerous behavioral issue that needs to be addressed.”
-
Protect Yourself: Refuse to host them until the uncle acknowledges the severity of the animal abuse. “Peace” cannot exist if your pet is in danger.
Conclusion
Violence in a family is always tragic, but standing by while a defenseless creature is abused is a different kind of tragedy. The OP reacted with a primitive, protective instinct. While a slap is not the ideal teaching tool, it may have been the shock to the system this family needed to realize that the 9-year-old isn’t just “acting out”, he is acting dangerously.
So, the consensus leans heavily toward NTA. But does a kicked cat justify a slapped child?









