Sometimes, new neighbors come in and think they can demand changes just because they don’t like something about the property.
For one Redditor, their new neighbors who had already been difficult in a number of ways, asked them to cut down all the trees along their fence line to improve their view.
When the Redditor refused and offered to trim some branches, the neighbors still weren’t satisfied. Instead of bending to their demands, the Redditor decided to let the trees grow even more, effectively blocking their view.
Was this petty revenge, or was it a reasonable stand against entitled neighbors? Read on to find out how others react to this “leave them to their leaves” decision.
New neighbors caused trouble and then asked to cut down trees blocking their “view”




















In our lives, we all hit a point where someone else’s boundaryless expectations push us to reclaim our space and dignity. That universal sting of feeling invaded, of being asked to give more than we owe, resonates deeply.
In this story, the new neighbours weren’t merely requesting minor accommodation: they expected the OP to reshape their yard purely for the neighbours’ benefit.
The OP had allowed previous trimming, but after the neighbours’ pattern of disregard (blocking the road, letting the dog bug others’ lawns), the demand to “cut down all the trees/bushes so we have a view” became symbolic.
It wasn’t just about leaves, it was about power, entitlement, and a lack of neighbourly respect. The OP’s decision to maintain the greenery wasn’t passive, it was a firm boundary. They chose privacy and equity over unearned compliance.
From a psychological standpoint, this reflects the concept of Psychological Reactance: the feeling of restricted freedom often triggers a counter‑reaction.
As described by authors in Psychology Today, when people sense their autonomy is being undermined, “when we perceive that someone or something is trying to influence us to do something against our will”, we resist.
Research shows that this motivational state arises when freedom is threatened or limited, prompting behaviour aimed at re‑establishing that sense of control.
Putting that insight into this scenario: the newcomers demanded action (tree trimming) that would diminish the OP’s control over their own property. The OP’s refusal and decision to let the foliage grow fuller can be seen not simply as stubbornness but as a restoration of agency.
By saying “no thanks, enjoy the view of the leaves,” the OP subtly reclaimed power. They weren’t punishing the neighbours; they were standing up for their right to define what happens on their land.
Here’s the comments of Reddit users:
This group suggested proactive measures to protect the trees, such as installing cameras and documenting the situation









These commenters shared ideas for passive ways to get back at problematic neighbors



![Neighbor Demanded They Cut Down Their Trees For A Better View, So They Let The Leaves Grow Wild [Reddit User] − Document your trees extensively and get an arborist to give you a written valuation.](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/wp-editor-1763743990567-13.webp)






These Redditors recounted their own experiences with difficult neighbors


![Neighbor Demanded They Cut Down Their Trees For A Better View, So They Let The Leaves Grow Wild [Reddit User] − I had one of these neighbors. His nickname was quickly FenceBoy.](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/wp-editor-1763744000359-22.webp)












What do you think? Were the neighbors out of line, or did the poster go a little too far with their leafy retaliation? Share your thoughts below!










