Retirement is supposed to be the “golden years”, a time for relaxation, hobbies, and finally cashing in on lifelong plans. But for one man on Reddit, his carefully mapped-out dream retirement in South America collided head-on with family ties and shifting priorities at home.
After 33 years of hard work, the 55-year-old retired and set his sights on the house he had been building overseas for more than a decade. His vision? Endless sunshine, a private pool, and 34 fruit trees. But while his dream was crystal clear, his wife’s had changed.
With grandchildren now in the picture, she wanted to stay close. What followed was a storm of family drama, accusations of selfishness, and a classic Reddit debate: is he chasing a selfish fantasy, or is she holding him back from a dream everyone knew about for decades?
One man booked a solo trip to his South American retirement home after his wife decided she’d rather stay near their grandkids




















Retirement is supposed to be the reward for decades of hard work, but for many couples it also reveals diverging priorities that had never been fully tested.
OP built his entire adult life around a clear dream: escaping winter and retiring to a home he carefully planned in South America. His wife participated in those plans, even helping with design choices, yet her perspective shifted after grandchildren entered the picture. Now, her definition of a fulfilling retirement is rooted in family connection, not geographic escape.
Neither stance is inherently wrong. In fact, surveys show that nearly 60% of grandparents in the U.S. provide some level of childcare for their grandchildren (Pew Research Center), highlighting how central grandchildren often become in later life.
For many, this involvement is not just about babysitting but about forging daily bonds, something OP’s wife fears losing if she spends seven months abroad.
Meanwhile, OP’s desire to avoid harsh winters is equally understandable. Studies on retirement migration show that “snowbirding”, spending winters in warmer climates, is linked to better physical health and higher life satisfaction among retirees.
His plan wasn’t impulsive; it was decades in the making. Yet, as family therapist Dr. Karl Pillemer notes, “Successful long-term relationships require constant renegotiation of life goals. What worked for a couple in their 30s may not fit at 60.”
This tension isn’t about beaches versus snow, it’s about flexibility and communication. OP may feel his wife is “changing the deal,” while she may feel blindsided by his unilateral decision to book a flight without deeper conversation.
A middle ground could exist: shorter stays abroad, alternating holidays, or inviting grandchildren down more frequently. But without active dialogue, resentment will only deepen.
Here’s what people had to say to OP:
These Reddit users backed OP, citing his transparency and his wife’s choice









This group voted no one was wrong, noting her grandkid-driven shift and suggesting compromises like shorter trips





However, these commenters called him a jerk, slamming his inflexibility and expecting family to travel






This group voted everyone was wrong, criticizing both for poor communication








At its heart, this conflict isn’t about snow versus sunshine, it’s about two people drifting toward different visions of family life. The husband clung to his long-promised escape, while the wife redefined happiness as rocking grandbabies through the holidays. Neither desire is wrong, but the silence between them speaks volumes.
Do you think the husband was justified in booking his ticket after decades of planning, or should he have compromised once grandchildren came into the picture? Could you stay married if your spouse wanted to live in another country for half the year? Share your thoughts!










