She Kept Giving Out His Phone Number, So He Started Canceling Her Appointments

Getting a new phone number is supposed to be a fresh start. New device, new digits, no baggage attached. But sometimes, that clean slate comes with someone else’s unfinished business, and it refuses to let go no matter how polite you try to be.

In this case, the OP kept receiving calls, texts, and notifications meant for the previous owner of the number. At first, they explained the mix-up and tried to be patient. But when the same name kept popping up again and again, it became clear this wasn’t a simple mistake.

The situation escalated after one unexpected app notification opened the door to direct contact, and the response they received only made things worse. What followed was a decision that has people debating boundaries, revenge, and whether the OP finally went too far. Keep reading to see how it all unfolded.

A man keeps getting calls meant for another woman, until he decides to push back

When a small disruption keeps returning, it stops feeling small. What begins as a mild inconvenience can quietly accumulate into something heavier, draining patience, eroding privacy, and unsettling a person’s sense of control over their own life.

Over time, repeated interruptions don’t just annoy; they intrude, turning everyday moments into reminders that peace is being chipped away without consent.

In this situation, the original poster (OP) wasn’t just annoyed by a misdirected text or wrong-number call. For over two years, they’ve endured a stream of communications meant for someone else, from friends and family messages to collection calls and every unwanted message reminded them they had no control over it.

Psychologically, a recurring intrusion like this challenges a person’s sense of autonomy because it repeatedly crosses boundaries the OP has tried, unsuccessfully, to set.

When people repeatedly experience unwanted contact without meaningful resolution, it can generate escalating frustration, stress, and even a kind of dark resignation, not out of malice, but from trying to reclaim agency over a situation they never asked for.

Most readers might see the OP’s retaliatory actions, canceling appointments, fabricating messages, and enjoying the chaos as impulsive or inappropriate. But another lens, rooted in interpersonal psychology, suggests something deeper: people push back hardest when they feel continually ignored.

When someone repeatedly violates your boundaries, especially after being told to stop, your brain interprets that as a disregard for your autonomy and privacy; the emotional reaction becomes less about the surface issue and more about the psychological experience of lack of control and repeated disrespect.

According to Psychology Today, the term “stalking” refers to “a pattern of unwanted contact or behavior that leads someone to feel upset, anxious, or scared for his or her safety,” and it notes that stalking involves repeated behavior that persists even after the individual has asked the stalker to stop contacting them, exactly the dynamic described here.

Another related concept is obsessive relational intrusion, where someone repeatedly invades another’s sense of privacy even without a preexisting relationship through unwanted contact.

These expert insights help clarify why the OP’s irritation isn’t simply “a funny wrong-number story.” Boundary violations, especially persistent ones, tap into emotional systems designed to protect personal autonomy and peace.

When someone feels ignored, their response may shift from polite explanation to assertive pushback, not because they enjoy conflict, but because they’re trying to defend what little control remains.

In closing, this story points to a real dilemma many people face in our hyperconnected age: the right to privacy versus unwanted intrusion.

Instead of escalating retaliation, the healthiest long-term responses include assertive boundary communication, documentation of unwanted contact, and, when necessary, leveraging technical or legal tools (such as number changes or contact blocking).

Ultimately, reclaiming peace often requires combining emotional awareness with proactive steps, a kind of psychological self-care many of us learn only through hard experience.

Here’s how people reacted to the post:

These commenters shared similar stories of sabotaging appointments or orders to stop misuse

This group encouraged escalating revenge tactics and intentional disruption

This user criticized the original offender’s stupidity and lack of responsibility

These commenters related long-term frustration with wrong-number calls and texts

Many readers sympathized with the Redditor’s frustration, even if some felt the quiet retaliation crossed into risky territory.

Was canceling appointments a fair response after two years of warnings, or did it turn annoyance into unnecessary conflict? And if you were stuck with someone else’s digital life pinging your phone daily, how long would you stay polite? Drop your takes below; this one’s ripe for debate.