When someone asks you to watch their kids but strips away every tool you’d need to keep them in check, you’re left with two options: sink or… watch them sink the house. That’s the choice one 17-year-old faced when her sister-in-law laid down a “no discipline” law before she could babysit her two toddlers.
What happened next? Let’s just say the living room looked like a crime scene involving crayons, toys, and pure toddler energy. Now the teen’s being called “spiteful,” but she insists she was just following orders.
One teen watched her nephew and niece wreak havoc, drawing on walls, flushing toys, and screaming without intervening














Parenting coaches say discipline isn’t just about punishment—it’s about guidance. Dr. Laura Markham of Aha! Parenting notes that “children thrive with clear boundaries, and removing those boundaries can lead to chaotic behavior because kids feel unsafe without them”.
In this case, the sitter was placed in a no-win situation. Without permission to correct behavior—or a toolkit of alternative strategies—she was left to manage two toddlers at their most unfiltered. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, consistency is key in child care; when caregivers have different rules from parents, it can confuse kids and worsen behavior.
Mandy’s approach may have also been influenced by “gentle parenting” trends, which focus on empathy and redirection instead of traditional discipline. But as psychologist Dr. Janet Lansbury points out, even gentle parenting requires active involvement—letting kids run wild isn’t the same as respecting their autonomy.
For the sitter, being 17 with no toddler experience meant she was already on a steep learning curve. Pediatrician Dr. Deborah Gilboa told Parents Magazine that inexperienced caregivers need “clear instructions, limits, and backup plans” to succeed. Mandy’s single instruction—don’t discipline—removed the very boundaries that could have kept the day under control.
Here’s what the community had to contribute:
These Redditors cheer her for following Mandy’s rule, calling the kids’ behavior a parenting fail





These users find her literal compliance hilarious, saying Mandy reaped what she sowed



These commenters note her inexperience and Mandy’s lack of guidance, questioning why parents paid instead of Casey





In the end, this babysitting gig turned into a master class in why clear rules matter—for both kids and caregivers. The teen learned that “just keeping them alive” can come at the cost of a trashed living room, while Mandy got a taste of what happens when you remove every behavioral boundary.
Was the teen immature, or was she simply following the only instruction she was given? And more importantly—would you have agreed to babysit a second time under those rules?









