Sometimes, you can be right all along and still feel guilty for not being more empathetic when someone you love gets hurt.
One man’s wife recently injured herself on a ledge in their home that he had warned her about for years. Despite his repeated reminders, she had continued to store items on the ledge, and her fall resulted in a serious injury.
While he feels terrible that she’s in pain, he can’t help but feel like the accident was predictable and completely avoidable. When he asked her why she chose to leave garden shears in such a dangerous spot, she accused him of being insensitive.
Is he right to ask her what she was thinking, or did his frustration with the situation cloud his judgment? Keep reading to see how this delicate situation unfolds.
A husband questions his wife’s decision after she injures herself, despite his warnings


















From the moment a spouse experiences an injury caused by a preventable hazard, what matters first is emotional connection, not fault‑finding. In this scenario, the husband’s repeated warnings to his wife about the basement ledge reflect a frustration built over time.
He wasn’t simply noticing an unsafe condition, he felt unheard. Meanwhile, the wife’s fall created shock, pain and likely guilt. The emotional terrain here is about vulnerability, communication breakdown and the frustration one partner feels when their concerns seem ignored.
The dynamic reaches beyond the action itself. The wife wasn’t just tripping over garden shears; she was likely operating under stress or distraction and perhaps didn’t appreciate how persistent the husband’s warnings had become.
The husband’s reaction, asking why she left them there, felt like a pursuit of accountability more than an inquiry. That shift from caring to corrective can make the injured party feel judged rather than supported.
Dr. John Gottman, co‑founder of the Gottman Institute, highlights that empathy, the capacity to reflect a partner’s feelings and let them know they’re understood, is foundational to healthy relationships.
One of his posts states: “empathy is a capacity to identify and share someone else’s emotions and experiences … a mirroring of a partner’s feelings in a way that lets them know that their feelings are understood and shared.”
His research‑based approach underscores that couples who respond with empathy instead of immediate critique build stronger emotional connection.
Applying that expert insight here: when the wife emerged injured, the moment to show empathy wasn’t over. The husband acknowledging how scary it must have been, how wrong the fall was and how he felt for her would create safety.
Later, once she’s calmer and physically okay, it would be appropriate to revisit the ledge issue with her input and planning. By asking about the decision process right after the injury, the husband arrived too early in the “fault” stage instead of the “feeling seen” stage.
These are the responses from Reddit users:
These users argue that the OP’s question was fair and important























This group feels the OP’s comment came across as “I told you so” and suggests that
















These users think the OP’s question was more about rubbing in the situation than being genuinely helpful










This user criticizes both the OP and their wife for not addressing the obvious safety hazard earlier










What do you think? Was the husband justified in asking the question, or should he have waited for a more appropriate time? Share your thoughts below!









