What begins as a kind gesture can easily turn into a one-sided arrangement. For a group of college students sharing an apartment, their goodwill toward a neighboring family slowly became an exhausting routine of free babysitting. Every “playdate” ended the same way, the parents disappeared, leaving them stranded with two toddlers.
When the neighbors tried to pull the same stunt again, one of the roommates finally snapped. Her firm refusal drew mixed reactions, but it also sparked an uncomfortable question among the building’s residents: when does being a “good neighbor” stop being your responsibility?
A group of college roommates finally refused to watch their neighbors’ twin toddlers after months of being taken advantage of

















Boundary-setting is crucial in any shared living environment, and experts agree that failing to establish them can have lasting effects on mental health.
Dr. Wendy Suzuki, a neuroscientist and professor at NYU, explains: “When individuals fail to enforce boundaries, stress levels rise, and feelings of resentment can accumulate. This is particularly relevant in communal or family-like settings.”
In this story, the roommates had multiple factors working against them: limited time due to work and school, a dependent infant in the household, and neighbors who repeatedly disregarded their autonomy.
By refusing unplanned childcare requests, they were not just protecting their own schedules, they were ensuring the safety of the twins, who could have been left unattended for hours if the parents ignored calls.
Community-based research supports this approach. A 2018 study in the Journal of Child and Family Studies found that boundaries and clear communication in residential complexes reduce stress and conflict among residents by 42%. The logic is simple: explicit expectations prevent misunderstandings and exploitation.
Furthermore, the involvement of authorities, such as child protective services, serves as a neutral enforcement mechanism. While the tenants initially tried polite refusal, escalation ensured accountability and highlighted the responsibility of parents to provide supervision.
These are the responses from Reddit users:
These Redditors mocked the neighbor’s hypocrisy, pointing out how he was the real leech for dumping his kids on others







These commenters praised OP for setting firm boundaries and said the neighbors were clearly taking advantage of them












These users agreed the kids aren’t OP’s responsibility and stressed that parents must arrange proper childcare





These Redditors supported OP’s warning and encouraged following through with CPS or cutting contact for safety






Sometimes, standing up for yourself means saying “no” to even the most persistent demands, especially when children and safety are involved. These roommates demonstrated that boundaries protect not only your own well-being but also that of others, including the children being left unsupervised.
How would you handle neighbors who overstep like this? Could polite refusal suffice, or is escalation necessary to enforce rules? Share your strategies and experiences below!










