Everyone has different thresholds for social interaction, and sometimes, especially on long flights, you just need a break.
This woman was traveling alone and tried multiple times to tell her seatmate, who had autism, that she wanted some quiet time. Despite her clear requests, he continued to engage with her, eventually prompting her to ignore him.
When he confronted her angrily, she felt guilty, knowing his behavior might stem from difficulties understanding social cues.
Is she in the wrong for not handling the situation with more patience, or was she justified in wanting to be left alone? Read on to explore the complexities of this situation and see if she made the right choice.
A woman feels guilty for ignoring a fellow passenger with autism on a flight after repeatedly trying to set boundaries



























In emotionally charged situations, we often find ourselves struggling to balance our own needs with the need for empathy toward others. In the OP’s case, her exhaustion after a long day, coupled with the overwhelming nature of an 11-hour flight, led to a desire for solitude.
However, her fellow passenger, who had autism, didn’t recognize the cues that she wasn’t in the mood to talk.
The truth of the situation is that emotional exhaustion can cloud our ability to navigate social boundaries, especially when interacting with someone who may not understand or process social cues in the same way.
For many people on the autism spectrum, understanding social boundaries and picking up on non-verbal cues can be incredibly difficult. This isn’t a matter of disregard or intentional harm but a neurological difference that makes social interaction challenging.
According to Verywell Mind, individuals with autism may not recognize subtle cues like body language or tone of voice, which are typically used by neurotypical individuals to signal when they need space.
In this case, the man in the story, while well-intentioned, continued to speak with the OP despite her clear verbal cues to the contrary, leading to frustration on both sides.
When examining the situation from a psychological perspective, it’s important to recognize that people with autism may not easily grasp the subtle dynamics of social interaction.
This challenge, known as the “double empathy problem,” means that misunderstandings arise not because one party is in the wrong, but because of differing communication styles.
Autism Parenting Magazine explains that these differences can cause confusion when one person doesn’t pick up on the other’s need for space or silence. In this case, OP’s repeated attempts to communicate her need for rest may not have been perceived in the way she intended.
An expert in this field, Dr. Stephen Shore, who is both a psychologist and someone with autism himself, sheds light on how these social challenges are not intentional but are rather a result of how the brain processes social information differently.
His work suggests that people on the spectrum often struggle to recognize when others want to disengage from a conversation, especially when the signals are not explicitly stated.
This aligns with the OP’s situation, where the lack of direct communication from her could have made the passenger feel confused or rejected.
While it’s clear that the OP’s need for space was justified, a more direct and compassionate approach might have alleviated the escalating tension.
By offering a firm but kind explanation, such as, “I’m really tired, but I promise we can talk later”, she might have helped the other person understand her boundaries without causing him emotional distress.
Moving forward, situations like these call for empathy toward both our own needs and the challenges faced by others. In these moments of tension, a bit of extra patience and clear communication could go a long way in fostering understanding and compassion for all parties involved.
Take a look at the comments from fellow users:
These commenters emphasize that while autism may make it harder to pick up on social cues, it does not justify harassing someone or ignoring their boundaries










These commenters support the idea that the poster was in the right to ask for space






This group focuses on how the man used his “nice guy” persona to manipulate and pressure the poster
![Woman Ignores Autistic Guy On 11-Hour Flight, He Gets Angry And She Moves Seats [Reddit User] − NTA - and I feel the need to correct you: he claimed he has autism.](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/wp-editor-1767770947493-5.webp)



![Woman Ignores Autistic Guy On 11-Hour Flight, He Gets Angry And She Moves Seats [Reddit User] − NTA, not even close. Being neurodivergent doesn’t entitle someone to your time,](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/wp-editor-1767770967836-14.webp)
















These commenters, both with autism, offer personal insights











Did the woman go too far by ignoring the man, or was she simply asserting her right to space? Redditors overwhelmingly agree that she was within her rights to refuse his advances after repeatedly asking for space.
While autism can make social interactions more complicated, that doesn’t mean others’ boundaries should be disregarded. What would you do if you were in this situation? Would you be more patient, or would you have set firmer boundaries? Share your thoughts below!









