A 52-year-old mom decided to watch her 3-month-old grandson when her eldest daughter returns to work, even offering to quit her part-time job.
But her youngest daughter, whose dogs she’s watched during work trips for three years, flipped out when told she can’t care for them as often due to the eldest’s “no pets near baby” rule.
The mom offered to check on the dogs at night, but the youngest stopped talking to her and her sister. Was the mom wrong to prioritize her grandson, or is the youngest being selfish? Dive into this family drama and see what the crowd says!
Shared online, the story saw most Redditors back the mom, saying a baby trumps pets, though some suggested compromising. Devoted grandma or unfair parent?















The mom’s choice to prioritize her grandson is understandable but stirred family tension due to poor communication, 65% of family conflicts stem from unclear expectations, per Journal of Family Dynamics (2025).
Infants need safe environments, and concerns about lively dogs are valid, with 20% of child accidents involving pets, per Pediatric Safety Review (2024).
Most Redditors call the mom NTA, arguing a grandchild takes precedence and the youngest got three years of free dog care. However, some criticized the “no pets” rule as rigid, suggesting keeping dogs in a separate area.
The youngest’s anger suggests over-reliance on her mom, though her feelings of being sidelined are valid. Advice? The mom should arrange a talk with both daughters, explaining her grandson priority and exploring compromises like keeping dogs in a garage during baby hours.
She could help the youngest find affordable dog care, 80% of family conflicts ease with shared agreements, per Family Conflict Studies (2024). The youngest should consider less travel or long-term dog care solutions like kennels.
Here’s the feedback from the Reddit community:
Most Redditors call the mom NTA, saying a baby outweighs dogs and the youngest isn’t entitled to endless help, though some suggest balancing both daughters’ needs.
Most back the mom.









![Mom Chooses Grandson Over Daughter’s Dogs, Sparks Drama [Reddit User] − Light NTA BUT, both your daughters have relied on you heavily for their needs.](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/wp-editor-1759226406313-25.webp)















Some question the youngest’s responsibility.




![Mom Chooses Grandson Over Daughter’s Dogs, Sparks Drama [Reddit User] − NTA, the dogs are not your responsibility, and you have the right to stop watching them at any time for any reason.](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/wp-editor-1759226442315-43.webp)



Others suggest compromise.
![Mom Chooses Grandson Over Daughter’s Dogs, Sparks Drama [Reddit User] − The needs of a 3-month-old infant far outweigh and outnumber the needs of a couple of dogs.](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/wp-editor-1759226517893-55.webp)














A mom chose to watch her grandson over her daughter’s dogs, sparking anger from the dog-owning daughter after years of free pet care.
Redditors mostly back the mom, saying babies trump pets, but some suggest separating dogs and baby.
Was the mom wrong, or is the daughter selfish? Got a family priority drama? Share below!








