Daily Highlight
  • MOVIE
  • TV
  • CELEB
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • MCU
  • DISNEY
  • About US
Daily Highlight
No Result
View All Result

Interviewer Says Candidate Walked In With A 99% Chance, Then Blew It By Refusing To Listen

by Layla Bui
November 30, 2025
in Social Issues

Job interviews can feel tense on both sides of the table, but OP never expected a candidate to derail the conversation so completely.

This applicant came in with a stellar résumé, great experience, and every reason to succeed, yet within minutes, it became clear he couldn’t stop talking long enough to let anyone else speak. Every attempt to guide the conversation was met with, “Just give me a moment,” followed by another long monologue.

As the interview spiraled, OP tried multiple times to redirect things politely, but the candidate kept interrupting, even during answers to his own questions. Finally, OP snapped and bluntly told him to shut up, ending the interview on the spot.

Now OP is wondering whether that reaction crossed a line or if the frustration was justified. Keep reading to see whether OP was the a**hole in this awkward situation.

Interviewer shuts down a nonstop-talking candidate after he derails every question in the room

Interviewer Says Candidate Walked In With A 99% Chance, Then Blew It By Refusing To Listen
not the actual photo

'AITAH for telling a guy to shut up during a job interview?'

I was interviewing this guy for a very good software engineering position.

He passed the first round, and both I and everyone involved in the second round really liked his resume and experience.

On paper, he had everything we were looking for, and honestly, this looked like a life-changing opportunity for him.

Then he shows up, very serious and not smiling at all.

I'm used to that in tech interviews, and I understand it can be an intimidating environment.

We did a round of introductions, and then he opened the interview by saying,

"Let me tell you a little bit about myself." We said, okay, go for it.

He started talking and talking about his personal and professional background.

After about three minutes, I jumped in to ask a follow-up question based on something he mentioned.

He replied, "I will answer, just give me a moment," and continued talking.

A coworker jumped in with another question, and he said the same thing to her.

At this point, we were kind of looking at each other, but decided to let him continue and give him the benefit of the doubt.

But after more than five minutes, I jumped in again with another question. I had to talk over him to do it.

He finally paused and answered, but in such a long-winded way that he ended up veering into another topic.

My coworker asked another question, and the same thing happened.

At this point, I was ready to end the interview.

I tried to politely wrap it up several times, but he was unable to read the room and just kept talking.

I finally raised my voice slightly and said something like, "Thank you very much for sharing your background.

In the interest of time, I’d like to ask if you have any questions for us."

This is standard protocol and helps us prepare answers for future interviews.

He asked a question about the team.

As I was answering, he raised his finger and interrupted to talk more about his background. I let it go.

Then he asked another question, which my coworker started to answer, but again,

he spoke over her to talk about himself. I tried once more to interrupt politely, but he kept talking.

At that point, I was done. I said, "John, you really have to shut up and listen."

He was surprised, as was my coworker, but he finally stopped talking.

I continued, "You walked into this room with a 99 percent chance of getting the job. Now that chance is zero.

The only reason is because, in less than fifteen minutes,

you’ve demonstrated that you don’t have the capacity to listen at all.

So I’m telling you now, you’re not getting the job.

But if you take anything away from this interview, let it be this: no matter how good you are technically,

if you can’t listen, you’ll never excel in this career."

He apologized and said, "Can we start again?"

I replied, "You had your chance. Best of luck in your future interviews. Make sure you listen."

Looking back, I know I could have handled that differently, but I still feel bad for the guy.

In workplace interactions, people want to feel heard. Whether someone is interviewing for a dream job or evaluating a candidate, respect and mutual attention shape the entire experience.

When one side dominates the conversation or ignores social cues, the emotional balance of the room shifts, creating tension as it did here.

From the OP’s perspective, the frustration was understandable. As an interviewer, part of the role is assessing how well a candidate listens and collaborates.

According to the U.S. Department of Labor’s O*NET database, “active listening” is listed as a required skill for software developers, involving giving full attention to others, taking turns speaking, and not interrupting.

The candidate’s behavior, talking over others, refusing to pause, and ignoring questions, directly contradicted these fundamental professional expectations.

Psychologically, his long-winded responses could reflect interview anxiety.

Research published by the American Psychological Association notes that when individuals experience acute stress, they may “overcompensate verbally” or lose awareness of conversational flow as a coping mechanism. This doesn’t excuse the behavior, but it does help explain why he struggled to stop talking.

At the same time, OP’s emotional reaction was shaped by the responsibility interviewers carry.

Harvard Business Review emphasizes that interviews are meant to be two-way conversations in which both parties exchange questions and information, not monologues. When the candidate repeatedly interrupted and ignored attempts to redirect, OP wasn’t just annoyed—he was losing control of the process.

The moment OP finally said, “You have to shut up and listen,” was the breaking point. It was blunt and harsher than ideal, but it also restored order in a situation that had escalated beyond polite correction.

The candidate’s reaction, surprise, followed by apology, suggests he genuinely didn’t realize how disruptive he had been.

There’s a certain bittersweet satisfaction in OP’s closing message: no matter how technically talented someone is, communication skills are essential.

This is backed by LinkedIn’s public Talent Insights data, which identifies communication and listening as top predictors of success in technical roles.

These are the responses from Reddit users:

This group says OP gave rare, valuable feedback and did the applicant a favor

BillyJayJersey505 − You actually gave him more feedback than many people would have. NTAH

ElemWiz − NTA. Honestly, he needed to hear it from someone in a position of hiring authority.

Sure, his ego may be bruised, but that likely needed to happen.

Frejian − NTA In this day and age of litigious-happy people, it is very rare for a candidate to get legitimate feedback,

especially about why specifically they are NOT getting a job

that hasn't gone through 5 different HR sanitization protocols to the point of being useless.

You did this guy a favor by actually being honest with him and giving him actionable feedback for future interviews.

If he can't understand that, then he is only proving you more correct in your assessment.

Were you a bit harsher than strictly necessary? Probably. But it definitely sounds warranted to get the point across.

These commenters think the applicant’s behavior was unbearable and OP was right

PoraDora − he had it coming. .. he was going to an interview, not a therapist

PersonalityFun2025 − God, I hate long-winded people who can't just answer a simple question.

Not long ago, I was speaking with someone and asked a simple question.

It could have been answered in 2 or 3 sentences. He went on for 20 minutes.

I couldn't wait to get out of that room. Can you imagine what this guy would have been like to work with?

You did the right thing.

WithAnAitchDammit − NTA I messed up interviewing someone once.

It was someone that worked with my then wife (now ex).

Interview was going OK and he started dropping f-bombs. I don’t mind foul language.

The army taught me how to use “f__k” like it’s a comma.

But there’s a time and place for it and an interview is not the place.

I hired him against my better judgement and ended up firing him a year later

because he was horrible at his job. Trust your guts, you made the right call.

This group agrees the bluntness helped, though wording could’ve been clearer

Tess408 − NTA. It sounds like he had rehearsed a speech and was really not ready for questions,

so he thought he could bombard you with the longest elevator pitch of all time.

He lacked the flexibility to read the room and respond to direct questions.

You gave great feedback that will help him in the future.

Sure, it was blunt, but if he is neurodivergent (seems very possible)

that is the most likely way to get through to him I've received interview feedback before and it was appreciated.

I'd rather learn from the experience than repeat the mistakes.

No-Sea1173 − NTA.   He needed something harsh to cut through the internal monologue spilling out into the room.

You did him a massive favour.

timeforacatnap852 − as an HR professional, you shouldn't use that specific language.

However, you're justified in your action and decision, it's only the language that would be an issue.

(alternatives-I need you to stop talking and listen to what I have to say right now;

you need to stop talking and listen now)

These Redditors suspect neurodivergence and say the applicant still needed firm correction

ImAnNPCsoWhat − Big info needed: are you a woman? Sounds like the type of guy to talk over women.

You honestly did him a favor with that advice.

And you did yourself and every woman in that office a favor by refusing to hire him.

Rude_Specialist8334 − If I had to guess this guy was likely neurodivergent/on the spectrum.

The behaviors of rambling endlessly unprompted, not wanting to be interrupted

and having no cognizance of the situation at hand are big indicators.

Nonetheless, NTA … professional tough love.

Let’s hope he discussed the experience with someone back home who will pretty much tell him the same: learn to listen.

Visible-Disaster − I have a team member like this.

We’ve tried to mentor and coach him, but he has a ”script” in his mind on how a meeting should go.

If you push him out of that, he glitches and can’t get move forward.

He also thinks he’s the smartest person in the room and is frequently wrong in areas that are not his expertise.

All while trying to talk over you. Unfortunately it’s not my decision to keep him.

This group shares workplace anecdotes and broader frustrations with interviewing norms

Andee-1 − NTA. It was an unorthodox way to end a job interview? Maybe It was effective?

Absolutely I would love for job interviewers to be this direct and blunt and not just,

"well call you" to proceed to wipe my number off his phone, just tell me what I did wrong dude,

so I can go and apply it with your direct competitor.

And for the guy, I hope this is his wake up call to start communicating better.

[Reddit User] − I once supervised a guy in a tech-adjacent role.

We did data analysis and we were working closely with a dev team on how to automate parts of it.

This guy studied engineering with a side of comp Sci and desperately wanted to move into tech.

He was actually a really nice helpful dude, normally.

He moved up to a team lead role in my team and I appreciated him.

So I started bringing him into the tech meetings, recognising that he probably had a pathway here

to start learning some relevant related tech project management skills

and maybe even move over to that side eventually. He was a disaster in every meeting.

He was so desperate to show off his technical knowledge to the dev team, he started talking over me,

his supervisor, constantly. He'd try to finish my sentences every sentence, always incorrectly.

Totally missing the point of the conversation and veering off on irrelevant tangents.

He was making himself look worse, not better, because he didn't know

how to have a productive meeting or let anyone else talk.

I had to say things like 'Johnny stop interrupting me and let me finish my sentence.

Johnny you will get to talk in a second but not now, Johnny I am speaking. ' He wouldn't stop.

It got to the point where I had say 'Johnny, JOHNNY! STOP!'

Like to an unruly child who wasn't listening. 'Johnny just stop for a second, Amy is speaking.

This isn't on topic for right now and you're talking over people. Just. Stop for a second please. '

He looked mortified, but started again a minute later so I just hushed him like a persistent toddler.

Just waving him off like 'Shhh not now Johnny' whenever he started speaking.

It was, obviously, a terrible look for him that he had to be treated like a child in professional meetings,

and clearly I had to stop including him in them, k__ling his opportunities for progression.

I felt bad for him of course, but it was his own behaviour that did it.

It's entirely fair and actually a kindness that you were so blunt with this guy.

Maybe he'll be able to learn from it what he clearly hasn't learned from more subtle feedback before you,

which I don't doubt he's had.

[Reddit User] − 99% chance? Meanwhile my brilliant introverted husband cannot even get in interviews. HR needs a better way.

No matter how stellar your background, if you walk into an interview behaving like it’s all about you, you might walk out with nothing. The candidate lost more than a job offer; he lost a lesson in humility and professional respect.

Do you think the interviewer was fair to bluntly call him out, or did he go too far for a first impression? Have you ever sat through an interview (or meeting) where someone wouldn’t stop talking? Share your thoughts below!

Layla Bui

Layla Bui

Hi, I’m Layla Bui. I’m a lifestyle and culture writer for Daily Highlight. Living in Los Angeles gives me endless energy and stories to share. I believe words have the power to question the world around us. Through my writing, I explore themes of wellness, belonging, and social pressure, the quiet struggles that shape so many of our lives.

Related Posts

A New Mom’s Topless Table Stunt Shut Down Her MIL’s Dinner Demands
Social Issues

A New Mom’s Topless Table Stunt Shut Down Her MIL’s Dinner Demands

4 months ago
A Young Woman Faces Backlash for Setting Financial Boundaries with Her Boyfriend – Is She Wrong?
Social Issues

A Young Woman Faces Backlash for Setting Financial Boundaries with Her Boyfriend – Is She Wrong?

6 months ago
Woman Presses Charges After Mother Abused Her As Child, Then Stole Her Education Savings As Adult
Social Issues

Woman Presses Charges After Mother Abused Her As Child, Then Stole Her Education Savings As Adult

2 months ago
Man Refuses To Move After Woman Fills 10-Item Lane, She’s Furious After Waiting Eight Minutes
Social Issues

Man Refuses To Move After Woman Fills 10-Item Lane, She’s Furious After Waiting Eight Minutes

2 months ago
Widow Shuts Down Stranger After She Assumes Her Kids Don’t Belong to Her
Social Issues

Widow Shuts Down Stranger After She Assumes Her Kids Don’t Belong to Her

5 days ago
Woman Demands Neighbor Remove Ring Doorbell Because It “Sees Her Door”, Gets Shut Down
Social Issues

Woman Demands Neighbor Remove Ring Doorbell Because It “Sees Her Door”, Gets Shut Down

4 months ago

TRENDING

Daniel Radcliffe Not Playing Wolverine in Deadpool & Wolverine
MCU

Daniel Radcliffe Not Playing Wolverine in Deadpool & Wolverine

by Daniel Garcia
July 15, 2024
0

...

Read more
He Was Told “Fire Us Anytime” – So He Used the Contract and Walked Away with 15 Months’ Pay
Social Issues

He Was Told “Fire Us Anytime” – So He Used the Contract and Walked Away with 15 Months’ Pay

by Charles Butler
November 5, 2025
0

...

Read more
He Was Told ‘Don’t Think, Just Work’, So He Stopped Fixing Things
Social Issues

He Was Told ‘Don’t Think, Just Work’, So He Stopped Fixing Things

by Charles Butler
November 26, 2025
0

...

Read more
New Deadpool & Wolverine Update Reveals Important Detail About Wolverine’s Introduction To The MCU
MCU

New Deadpool & Wolverine Update Reveals Important Detail About Wolverine’s Introduction To The MCU

by Marry Anna
May 24, 2024
0

...

Read more
Robert Downey Jr.’s Personal Assistant, Jimmy Rich, Died At The Age Of 52
News

Robert Downey Jr.’s Personal Assistant, Jimmy Rich, Died At The Age Of 52

by Anna Martinez
April 17, 2024
0

...

Read more




Daily Highlight

© 2024 DAILYHIGHLIGHT.COM

Navigate Site

  • About US
  • Contact US
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • DMCA
  • Cookie Policy
  • ADVERTISING POLICY
  • Corrections Policy
  • SYNDICATION
  • Editorial Policy
  • Ethics Policy
  • Fact Checking Policy
  • Sitemap

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • MOVIE
  • TV
  • CELEB
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • MCU
  • DISNEY
  • About US

© 2024 DAILYHIGHLIGHT.COM