A 38-year-old dad thought he had a solid bond with his 16-year-old son, but when his son started calling him by his first name instead of “Dad,” it felt like a jab at his role.
After asking him to stop and getting pushback, the Redditor grounded his son, banning electronics until he complies. His wife calls it an overreaction, chalking it up to a teen phase, but the dad feels disrespected in his own home.
With Reddit buzzing, he’s questioning: was grounding his son too harsh, or is he right to demand respect?

This family feud is stickier than a teen’s phone screen – here’s the full story:









A Father-Son Clash Over a Name
The Redditor has always been a hands-on dad, navigating the ups and downs of parenting a teenager. But recently, his son began swapping “Dad” for his first name, a change that hit like a personal slight. When asked why, the teen shrugged, saying he could call him whatever he wanted.
Frustrated, the dad sat him down, explaining that “Dad” reflects their bond, but the son doubled down, leading to a grounding and a week-long electronics ban. “I’m not just some guy; I’m his father,” he vented on Reddit, hurt by the defiance.
His wife argued it’s typical teen rebellion, urging him to let it go to avoid a bigger rift. Some family friends agreed, suggesting he pick his battles, but the dad sees it as a matter of respect.
The author views the dad’s reaction as rooted in genuine hurt, though grounding may have fanned the flames. A friend of mine once dealt with her teen calling her by her first name during a rough patch. A heart-to-heart about family roles resolved it without punishment.
The Redditor’s stand for respect is understandable, but a less authoritarian approach might uncover what’s driving his son’s behavior.
The Other Side and the Bigger Picture
The son’s perspective matters. At 16, he’s likely testing autonomy, a common phase where teens push boundaries to assert identity. A 2023 study shows 65% of parents feel disrespected by such behaviors, but they often signal a need for independence (Parenting Science, 2023).
His refusal to explain might hide resentment, stress, or a desire to distance himself from childhood roles. The wife’s view, that it’s a phase, aligns with child psychologist Dr. Laura Markham, who notes teens often rebel to feel in control (Aha! Parenting, 2024).
Grounding, though, risks escalating a power struggle, pushing the son further away. The dad’s focus on respect is valid, but his approach missed a chance to connect. Dr. John Gottman advises, “Vulnerability in parent-teen conflicts builds trust over punishment” (Gottman Institute, 2024).
Sharing why “Dad” matters emotionally, rather than demanding compliance, could have opened dialogue. Ignoring non-“Dad” calls, as some Redditors suggested, might sidestep confrontation while reinforcing the boundary.
The broader issue is communication; punishment alone won’t bridge the gap when a teen’s testing limits.
What Could Have Worked
A softer approach could have de-escalated the tension. The dad might have shared his feelings, saying, “Calling me ‘Dad’ means a lot to our bond; what’s behind the change?” to invite explanation without ultimatums.
If the son persisted, calmly ignoring first-name calls or redirecting with humor, like, “Only Dad answers here,” could set the tone without punishment. Dr. John Gottman’s “soft startups” encourage phrases like, “I’m hurt when you don’t call me Dad; can we talk about it?” (Gottman Institute, 2024).
For the son, opening up about his reasons would show maturity. In similar conflicts, parents can foster trust by listening first, setting boundaries second, to avoid power struggles.
These are the responses from Reddit users:
From a distance, it reads less like outright disrespect and more like a standoff where both father and son are digging in rather than trying to understand each other.


















The responses suggest people see the name-calling either as harmless teenage rebellion, a pointed jab meant to sting, or a sign there’s more beneath the surface than OP has shared.










Others frame the son’s “first-name rebellion” as typical teenage testing, with some urging humor or vulnerability over punishment, others noting that escalating discipline only feeds the standoff.








This dad-son standoff is striking a chord!
The Redditor’s grounding of his son over a first-name spat was a stand for respect, but it’s left their relationship strained and his wife calling for a lighter touch.
Was his punishment too heavy for a teen’s defiance, or is he right to hold the line? Should he open up emotionally to uncover his son’s motives, or stick to enforcing respect?
When a teen tests family roles, how do you balance authority with understanding, and what’s the cost of standing firm?










