Mother-In-Law Insists On Calling Her ‘Rose’ Despite Multiple Corrections, Here’s What Happened

Names hold a lot of power, and the way someone is addressed can tell you a lot about respect or the lack of it. For this woman, her in-laws have continuously ignored her clear preference for the name “Rosie” and insisted on calling her “Rose” despite multiple corrections.

What began as a simple misunderstanding has evolved into a frustrating battle of wills, with her husband’s parents refusing to acknowledge her boundaries.

Now, as a soon-to-be mother, her patience has worn thin, and she’s started ignoring them every time they call her by the wrong name. But her in-laws don’t think it’s a big deal until her reaction made them feel embarrassed in front of others. Keep reading to see if this situation has gone too far or if she’s justified in standing her ground.

In-laws insist on calling her Rose instead of Rosie, so here’s what she does

Names are part of our identity and deserve respect. Many people have experienced the irritation or hurt of being repeatedly misnamed, especially after politely correcting someone.

In this case, the woman’s insistence that her in-laws call her Rosie isn’t trivial. It’s a boundary she set to protect her sense of self. Their refusal to honor it feels dismissive and emotionally invalidating.

Psychologically, this kind of behavior can be harmful. When someone’s feelings, identity, or sense of self are dismissed, even repeatedly misnaming them after corrections, it counts as a form of emotional invalidation.

Psychology Today describes emotional invalidation as when one’s feelings or experiences are rejected or minimized; it can create feelings of invisibility, disrespect, and self-doubt.

Moreover, establishing and maintaining personal boundaries, including how we want to be addressed, is a crucial part of emotional and relational health.

According to Verywell Mind, respecting others’ boundaries helps build trust, emotional safety, and healthy relationships. When someone persistently ignores those boundaries, it undermines mutual respect and can erode the sense of security in a relationship.

Her choice to ignore her in‑laws when they call her “Rose” rather than “Rosie” can be understood as a protective measure, a way to reclaim control over her identity and avoid emotional discomfort. She isn’t asking for something unreasonable; she’s asking for basic courtesy and respect.

That refusal to acknowledge her name repeatedly could be seen as subtly manipulative or controlling, especially in a context where power dynamics (in‑laws vs. new spouse) often come into play.

Of course, some might say that this is petty or that “Rose” sounds more mature or formal. But that argument misses the core point: identity isn’t about convenience or aesthetics. It’s about selfhood.

When people dismiss someone’s chosen name, especially after being corrected, they signal that the other person’s feelings and identity don’t matter. Over time, that erodes trust and self‑worth.

In many relationships, especially with in‑laws, respect is built on honoring each person’s boundaries, even small ones. If a name matters to you, it deserves to be honored. Insisting on being called the correct name isn’t dramatic; it’s necessary for feeling seen, respected, and human.

Here’s what people had to say to OP:

This group emphasizes that respecting someone’s name is basic courtesy, and OP has every right to insist on it

These commenters suggested playful retaliation, like calling them by variations of their names or correcting them in front of others

This group appreciated the husband’s support and found humor in the situation, with some pointing out that it’s a good learning moment for the in-laws

This story demonstrates how something as simple as a name can carry so much emotional weight. For the Redditor, this wasn’t just a trivial matter, it was about standing up for her identity and boundaries.

Many readers agree that ignoring the in-laws is an effective way to assert herself, especially since they refuse to respect her wishes. So what do you think? Is she justified in taking this approach, or should she have been more patient with her in-laws? Share your thoughts below!