Wedding planning is supposed to be fun, but when family traditions collide with deeply personal beliefs, things can get messy fast. One bride-to-be found herself in exactly that situation after telling her fiancé she didn’t want to use his family’s heirloom rings because of their “bad karma.”
Instead of a quiet compromise, she got a fiancé calling her beliefs “dumb” and a future MIL firing off a barrage of nasty texts. Cue heartbreak, therapy plans, and a postponed wedding. Reddit had plenty to say about who went wrong here and if this marriage even stands a chance.
One spiritually attuned bride-to-be, set on infusing her wedding with positive energies, uncovers her fiancé’s unmentioned plan to use his family’s storied rings




















It’s amazing how often the biggest fights in marriages-to-be aren’t about money, sex, or in-laws but about jewelry. In this case, OP assumed her fiancé didn’t want to use the heirloom rings, while he assumed she was on board with tradition. Cue a blow-up over family customs, spirituality, and a mother-in-law who apparently thinks “supportive texts” means sending dozens of insults.
At its heart, this isn’t just about rings. It’s about competing values. OP views the heirloom rings as spiritually “tainted” by divorce. Her fiancé sees them as sacred family artifacts and a visible tie to generations before him.
Both perspectives make sense when viewed through their respective lenses but neither bothered to explicitly clarify expectations until the conflict erupted. That’s a communication failure, not just a jewelry problem.
Psychologists have long noted that couples often clash hardest when traditions collide with personal beliefs. Dr. John Gottman, a leading relationship researcher, points out: “In happy marriages, couples make their traditions their own. They honor the past, but they also create rituals that are uniquely meaningful to them.”
That quote lands squarely on this situation. The rings themselves are neutral objects. What matters is the meaning each partner attaches to them. OP’s fiancé sees them as continuity; she sees them as bad karma. Without compromise, the rings become a stand-in for something bigger — whose worldview will dominate in the marriage?
The broader issue is how couples handle traditions. According to a 2016 Pew Research Center survey, 57% of married adults said sharing religious or spiritual beliefs was “very important” to a successful marriage, but just as critical was agreeing on values and traditions. When traditions feel imposed rather than chosen, resentment can fester.
So what should OP do? The update shows progress: she admitted she was dictating, he admitted he dismissed her beliefs, and they agreed to therapy. That’s exactly the healthy route. A workable compromise might include cleansing rituals or adding crystals, so the rings honor both tradition and spirituality. The key is that both voices must count.
See what others had to share with OP:
This consensus crew crowed “ESH” in harmonious harmony, honing in on the duo’s dialogue drought



















Bucking the balanced brigade, this commenter tilted toward the bride’s turf, touting her ring rejection as righteous

What started as a disagreement about jewelry revealed deeper fractures: respect for beliefs, communication gaps, and meddling family dynamics. The couple has put their wedding on pause to try counseling, a hopeful sign that they’re committed to working through it.
But the central question remains: when family tradition and personal beliefs collide, who gets the final say? Should you honor the past or protect your own future peace of mind?










