Pregnancy is supposed to be an exciting time for couples, but for one woman, her husband’s lack of involvement has left her feeling frustrated and unappreciated.
As they eagerly awaited their baby’s gender reveal appointment, the husband once again chose to skip it, opting for a meal with friends instead. When the wife refused to share the results with him afterward, insisting that he had forfeited his right to know, all hell broke loose.
Now, the husband is furious, and his family is pressuring the wife to “stop playing games” and tell him the gender. But she’s standing firm, unwilling to let him off the hook for his repeated absenteeism. Was she justified in withholding the information, or did she take things too far in her frustration? Read on to find out how this pregnancy drama unfolded.
A woman refuses to reveal her baby’s gender to her husband after he skipped the appointment






















There’s a painful truth many expectant parents feel, which is that pregnancy often brings expectation and hope, but also emotional fragility and a deep need for support.
In this story, the OP clearly expected her husband to share part of that journey. When he skipped the baby’s important gender‑reveal appointment to hang out with friends, she felt seen as less important and deeply hurt. Her decision to withhold the baby’s gender from him until birth was a boundary she set in reaction to feeling neglected and unvalued.
Inside that choice lies grief over lost support, and a quiet demand: show me you care as much as you expect to benefit. Her husband’s repeated absence from appointments, even while friends and hobbies took priority, may feel like emotional abandonment at a time when she needs partnership the most.
By refusing to tell him the result, she’s pointing out that pregnancy is a shared path, or at least it should be.
Psychology backs up how important partner involvement is during pregnancy, both for emotional well‑being and the health of mom and baby.
A study published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth found that where women felt supported by their partner, mental stress dropped, anxiety was lower, and mothers felt more empowered.
Another paper shows that partner attendance at prenatal visits, even simple ones, fosters better communication, shared decision‑making, and a sense of unity.
In relationship‑therapy theory, boundaries also serve a protective role when needs go unmet. According to experts at the Gottman Institute, healthy boundaries are not ultimatums; they’re decisions we make to protect our emotional well‑being when another person repeatedly ignores our needs.
Given that, the OP’s refusal to share the gender can be read not as pettiness but as a clear boundary. She isn’t demanding that her husband suddenly become perfect; she’s saying: if you truly want to be part of this together, show up. Otherwise, I won’t treat your absence lightly.
That said, it’s a rocky path. This boundary may protect her right now, but unless it’s followed by honest conversation, it might create lasting distance. Her husband may feel punished rather than encouraged to change. Trust can fray when secrets are used as leverage.
Here’s the input from the Reddit crowd:
These commenters were firm in saying that the partner is showing signs of being an absentee father







This group pointed out that the partner’s refusal to attend the doctor’s appointment shows a lack of responsibility





These Redditors emphasized that the scan is about the baby’s health, not just gender, and criticized the partner’s selfishness











![Woman Refuses To Tell Husband Baby's Gender After He Skips Appointment [Reddit User] − "I'm not the one carrying that baby why should I be there? " and then suddenly "I'm the father I have the right to know!" Oh](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/wp-editor-1764300690373-24.webp)





These users warned that this pattern of selfishness would likely persist after the birth








This commenter went a step further



What do you think? Should the wife have been more understanding, or is her reaction valid considering his repeated negligence? Share your thoughts below!










