Parents have the right to make decisions about their children’s upbringing, but sometimes those decisions seem a bit out of touch. What happens when a family member disagrees with the rationale behind a particular parenting choice?
A young aunt finds herself in a difficult spot when she questions her brother-in-law’s reasoning for not allowing his daughter to get her ears pierced. The explanation, centered around fears of unwanted attention from boys, doesn’t sit well with her.
After offering her honest opinion, she’s met with a wave of anger from her sister.














At first glance, the conflict seems to revolve around a 12‑year‑old’s desire to get her ears pierced and the father’s insistence she shouldn’t, but really it’s about deeper issues: control, autonomy, and how we view a young girl’s body in transition.
The OP observed the father’s reasoning, that earrings attract boys’ attention, and called it “misplaced at best and creepy at worst.”
That blunt language may have escalated the fight, but it also pointed to a genuine tension: is the decision about safety/care or about controlling attention and appearance?
Psychological research suggests the importance of autonomy support in children’s development.
For example, a meta‑analysis found that when parents provide autonomy‑supportive environments (allowing choice, respecting the child’s voice), children’s well‑being improves; conversely, psychologically controlling parenting is linked to poorer outcomes.
In other words, when children feel they have some control over their bodies and choices, they tend to flourish; when adults impose strict control without listening, it can undermine their confidence and identity.
In the context of body modifications such as piercings, an article for parents noted that “body piercings can serve as a form of self‑expression and personal autonomy,” and that parents should engage in “open, non‑judgmental conversations” rather than outright bans.
This suggests that the girl’s request to get her ears pierced might be less about seeking male attention and more about exploring her identity, and that dismissing it purely on the basis of potential external reactions overlooks her voice.
From the father’s side: his concern may be genuine, he might worry about how others treat his daughter, and perhaps believe he is protecting her.
But when the stated reason becomes “she might attract boys” rather than “the piercing is medically safe and you understand the risks,” it introduces gendered assumptions and takes agency away from the girl.
The OP’s intervention, though confrontational, highlighted the mismatch between parental control and adolescent autonomy.
The family should engage in a calm discussion with the daughter present. The father could explain his concerns (safety, long‑term consequences, hygiene) and invite her to share why she wants the piercing.
They might agree on a readiness checklist: she demonstrates responsibility, understands risks, chooses a reputable piercer. This balances parental care with her autonomy.
Instead of a flat “no,” they could say “let’s revisit this when you meet criteria.” That way, the daughter feels heard and the parents maintain safe oversight.
Take a look at the comments from fellow users:
This group was absolutely stunned that a father would sexualize something as innocent as earrings and then use that as a reason to control his daughter’s decisions.






















This group focused on OP’s sister, accusing her of either ignoring or refusing to confront the issue at hand, and allowing her husband’s creepy views to take precedence.








This group saw this situation as a symptom of a larger issue in the family dynamic, where one parent’s personal views were being imposed on the child.








While the OP’s concern is valid, wanting to address what she sees as a concerning justification for a parental decision, her delivery didn’t land well with her sister and brother-in-law.
Was the OP wrong to call out the creepy reasoning, or did she go too far in voicing her opinion on something that didn’t involve her? Where should we draw the line when speaking up about someone else’s kids? Share your thoughts below!








