Vacations are supposed to be about relaxation, swimming, and fun. But for one woman, a family trip turned into a tense standoff about bodily autonomy and outdated myths.
When she realized her boyfriend’s teenage cousin was sitting out of the pool because she wasn’t “allowed” to use tampons, she offered a simple solution: she would buy them. The reaction she got, not from the girl, but from her own boyfriend, exposed a deep-seated misogyny that left the internet reeling.
Now, read the full story:










































Reading this story, you can’t help but feel a knot of frustration in your stomach. It is one thing to deal with conservative family values, but it is another entirely to watch a young girl be actively sidelined from joy because of them. The image of a teenager sitting on the sidelines, sweating in the heat while her boyfriend plays in the water, is heartbreakingly unfair.
It feels incredibly isolating to be the only one “stuck on the shore” due to biology, especially when a simple solution exists. The OP’s anger is palpable and completely justified. It’s a stark reminder that while we think we’ve moved past these archaic taboos, they are still very much alive, quietly ruining family vacations.
The “Purity Myth” That Won’t Die
The boyfriend’s reaction, specifically the phrase “she shouldn’t be putting anything up there,” is a classic red flag rooted in Purity Culture. This ideology often sexualizes female biology, viewing the use of tampons not as hygiene, but as a threat to “virginity” or “innocence.”
It is a pervasive myth that refuses to fade away, despite medical evidence to the contrary. The idea that a tampon can “take” a girl’s virginity is biologically incorrect.
According to Dr. Amy W. Anzilotti, a medical expert for KidsHealth, this confusion often stems from the hymen.
“Most people think of a virgin as someone who hasn’t had vaginal sex… Putting in a tampon can stretch the hymen and even tear it, but this isn’t common. If you use a tampon and haven’t had vaginal sex, you’re still a virgin.” — KidsHealth.org
The boyfriend’s concern about “protection” implies that the girl’s value is tied to her physical “intactness,” rather than her autonomy or ability to enjoy a family vacation. This mindset has real-world consequences. A study published in the Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology found that cultural taboos and maternal disapproval are significant barriers to tampon use for many adolescents, leading to unnecessary anxiety and exclusion from activities like swimming.
By denying the cousin access to tampons, the family (and the OP’s boyfriend) are enforcing a form of control that limits her freedom. As Dr. J. Ravichandran noted in an interview with the Hindustan Times, “Emphasizing comfort, cleanliness, and health should take precedence over outdated notions of purity.”
Check out how the community responded:
Users pointed out that sexualizing a hygiene product is a massive red flag.







![Boyfriend Says Buying Tampons For His 17-Year-Old Cousin "Sends The Wrong Message" [Reddit User] - Nta. Uhh your boyfriend is a misogynist.](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/wp-editor-1770117627343-8.webp)
Commenters emphasized that at 17 years old, the cousin is more than capable of deciding what products she wants to use.






Users were quick to point out the absurdity of the boyfriend trying to “protect” the cousin’s virginity from a piece of cotton.
![Boyfriend Says Buying Tampons For His 17-Year-Old Cousin "Sends The Wrong Message" [Reddit User] - NTA. Her bf is literally there with them? ?? What do they expect is going on with her and the bf.](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/wp-editor-1770117565322-1.webp)
![Boyfriend Says Buying Tampons For His 17-Year-Old Cousin "Sends The Wrong Message" Their reason of the tampon giving a s__[ex]__ual stimulation is just thrown out the window logically since the bf is there. That logic and ideology is so so disgusting.](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/wp-editor-1770117566650-2.webp)
![Boyfriend Says Buying Tampons For His 17-Year-Old Cousin "Sends The Wrong Message" Cautious-Crafter-667 - NTA. People who think tampons are s__[ex]ual in any way need to get over themselves.](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/wp-editor-1770117568022-3.webp)
![Boyfriend Says Buying Tampons For His 17-Year-Old Cousin "Sends The Wrong Message" I’ve used them almost exclusively for most of my bleeding life and it has never once felt s[ex]__ual.](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/wp-editor-1770117569226-4.webp)
![Boyfriend Says Buying Tampons For His 17-Year-Old Cousin "Sends The Wrong Message" No-Giraffe-8096 - There is such a f__[messed]__ up and creepy need some people feel to “protect” a girls vagina.](https://dailyhighlight.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/wp-editor-1770117570546-5.webp)

How to Navigate a Situation Like This
If you find yourself in a situation where you want to help a teenager but fear stepping on parental toes, the “discrete offer” is usually the best approach.
Do exactly what the OP did: buy the product for yourself, mention casually to the teen that it is available if they need it, and then drop it. This respects the teen’s autonomy without creating a direct confrontation with the parents (or the opinionated boyfriend). It gives the teen a choice—something they clearly aren’t getting at home.
However, the bigger issue here is the relationship dynamic. If your partner holds views that fundamentally restrict women’s freedom or sexualize their biology, that is a core value difference. It requires a serious conversation, not just about tampons, but about how they view women in general. As the OP noted in her update, she plans to “pry deeper” into these ideologies. That is a smart move.
So, the consensus seems to be that the OP is NTA for offering the tampons, but she might be the asshole to herself if she stays with this guy without seeing change.
What do you think? Is it ever okay for a relative to “overrule” a parent’s rule about hygiene products, or does bodily autonomy always come first?









