Imagine inheriting a fortune, only to have your sister expect a chunk for her IVF dreams with the guy who helped her cheat on your best friend!
That’s the messy family drama one Redditor faced when her sister, Meg, demanded money to fund IVF with her partner, Liam, after a four-year affair that shattered her ex, Josh.
The Redditor, still loyal to Josh, refused to bankroll their baby plans but offered to help Meg in other ways, only to be met with screams and accusations of unfairness. Redirecting the funds to her nephew’s future didn’t calm the storm.
Was she wrong to draw a line, or is Meg’s entitlement the real issue? Reddit’s got takes juicier than a family soap opera. Ready for the full story? Dive in below!
This sibling showdown is spicier than a tabloid headline! Check out the original post:
The Story Unfolds
This inheritance drama unfolded when the Redditor received a sizeable sum of money and chose to share it fairly with her family.
Wanting to avoid conflict, she distributed portions to her parents and each of her siblings, including Meg. The money was meant to be flexible, a way to help with debts, renovations, education, or other meaningful goals.
But Meg’s request stood out from the rest. Instead of asking for financial relief or something practical, she demanded that her share be specifically used to fund IVF treatments with Liam. To the Redditor, this wasn’t just another family expense, it was deeply personal.
Here’s why: Meg had once dated Josh, the Redditor’s closest friend. Despite her initial disapproval of the relationship, she supported it for the sake of her best friend. Then came the betrayal.
Meg carried on an affair with Liam, Josh’s best friend, for four long years. When the truth came out, it wasn’t just a breakup, it was an explosion. Josh was left devastated, so much so that he sought years of therapy to heal from the emotional wreckage.
Now, Meg wanted the Redditor to contribute financially to her future with Liam. To the Redditor, it felt like endorsing a relationship built on lies and betrayal.
She refused, offering instead to use the money to support Meg in other ways, paying down debt, contributing to her household, or setting aside funds for her child. But Meg exploded in anger, accusing her of unfairness because another sister had used her inheritance share for IVF without issue.
The difference, according to the Redditor, was obvious: the other sister’s request didn’t carry the baggage of betrayal and broken trust. Supporting Meg and Liam’s IVF felt like turning her back on Josh, the best friend she still stood by.
The confrontation escalated into a screaming match. Meg called her cruel and selfish, claiming the affair was “in the past” and demanding equal treatment.
The Redditor stood firm, redirecting Meg’s portion into a fund for her nephew instead. What was meant to be a generous gesture turned into a full-blown family feud, with accusations flying and relationships strained to the breaking point.
Expert Opinion
Talk about a family feud that could rival a daytime drama! This Redditor’s refusal to fund her sister Meg’s IVF with Liam, the man she cheated with for four years, sparked an explosion of old wounds. Her decision wasn’t about money, it was about loyalty, betrayal, and personal boundaries.
The context here matters. Infidelity doesn’t just affect the couple; it ripples outward. Relationship expert Dr. Esther Perel explains in The State of Affairs that betrayal often “forces loved ones to pick sides,” leaving friendships, families, and even entire communities fractured.
The Redditor’s bond with Josh was shattered by Meg’s choices, and asking her to finance the relationship that caused his pain was tone-deaf at best.
A 2022 study in the Journal of Family Psychology also highlights how betrayal can damage trust within families for years, particularly when the betrayer shows little remorse.
Meg’s insistence that “it’s in the past” is an attempt to move on without truly acknowledging the harm caused. From the Redditor’s perspective, that lack of accountability makes it impossible to support the request without feeling complicit.
It’s worth noting that the Redditor wasn’t refusing to help at all, she offered to put the funds toward debts, renovations, or even her nephew’s future.
That shows she values fairness and family but refuses to bankroll a situation that directly conflicts with her principles. This distinction matters.
According to family therapist Dr. Nedra Tawwab, boundaries are “not walls but guidelines for how we expect to be treated.” In this case, the Redditor set a boundary: she would not cross into financially endorsing a relationship that caused so much damage.
Meg’s outburst also highlights entitlement. Rather than appreciating the alternatives offered, she fixated on IVF and framed refusal as cruelty.
This attitude suggests the issue isn’t really about fairness but about control, demanding that her sister validate her life choices, no matter the cost.
Could this conflict have been avoided? Possibly. Family mediation might help bridge the gap, allowing Meg to express her hurt and the Redditor to explain the depth of her loyalty to Josh.
But unless Meg takes responsibility for her past actions and acknowledges their impact, reconciliation will remain an uphill climb.
In the end, the Redditor’s choice to stand firm aligns with protecting her self-respect. Supporting family doesn’t mean abandoning personal principles, especially when betrayal is involved.
Her redirecting funds to her nephew strikes a balance, helping the next generation without rewarding a relationship she cannot stand behind.
Here’s the feedback from the Reddit community:
Many commenters agreed that OP is NTA, emphasizing that it’s their inheritance and they can choose how to use it.
Other commenters agreed OP is NTA, highlighting that the sister’s past actions toward Josh directly involved OP.
Others agreed OP is NTA, emphasizing that OP’s sister’s four-year affair directly harmed both OP and their best friend, and that OP has full discretion over how to use their inheritance.
Are these takes pure wisdom or just the internet’s loudest family counselors?
This Redditor’s stand against funding her sister’s IVF with a cheating partner turned a generous inheritance into a family firestorm. Was she wrong to prioritize her loyalty to her best friend and redirect the money to her nephew?
With Meg’s entitlement and past betrayal fueling the fight, the Redditor’s drawing a line feels like self-respect. Should she have caved to keep things civil, or was protecting her principles worth the fallout?
How would you handle a sister demanding money for a controversial cause? Drop your thoughts below and let’s unpack this drama!
