Owning something that others cannot afford does not automatically make it community property.
Sometimes, a simple neighborhood disagreement can become surprisingly complicated when one person believes another person owes them access to their belongings.
The original poster (OP) bought his home years ago and invested heavily in improving the property, including adding a swimming pool.
He generally gets along with his neighbors, but a new family nearby has already caused several problems.
Then OP discovered something unexpected on his security camera that took the neighborhood dispute to another level.
Scroll down to see what happened when he confronted the situation.
A homeowner discovers neighborhood children using his pool without permission






















Sometimes what makes a boundary violation infuriating is not only the act itself, but the assumption that the owner should feel guilty for objecting.
This homeowner woke up to find six unfamiliar children using his pool without permission, with one piece of equipment reportedly damaged in the process.
He did not know the children, had not invited them, and had no adult supervising them on his property.
Calling the non-emergency police line was therefore less about refusing to share and more about stopping an unsafe situation he had never agreed to manage.
The emotional dynamic became even clearer when the children’s mother arrived.
Rather than apologizing or acknowledging that her children had entered someone else’s yard, she reportedly argued that owning a pool created an obligation to let others use it because “not everyone can afford one.”
That reasoning shifts responsibility in a striking way.
The homeowner becomes selfish for protecting something he purchased, while the unauthorized entry becomes framed as understandable or even justified.
There is another perspective worth considering.
The children themselves may not have fully understood the seriousness of what they were doing, especially if the adults around them had taught them that access to something desirable was negotiable after the fact.
The more troubling behavior may therefore be the parent’s response.
Children learn boundaries partly through whether adults calmly reinforce limits or teach them that another person’s “no” is unfair.
That framework fits this situation almost literally. A private backyard and swimming pool are not community amenities simply because neighbors can see them.
The owner can choose generosity when trust and relationships exist, but generosity loses its meaning when someone else declares it mandatory.
The practical response now is consistency rather than escalation.
Securing the yard, documenting damage, preserving camera footage, and making the rule unmistakably clear can reduce future ambiguity.
If problems continue, he can use the appropriate local channels rather than confronting children directly.
Perhaps the most important distinction is simple: lacking access to something does not create a right to someone else’s property.
Sharing is kind when it is offered. Once it is demanded, it stops being sharing at all.
Here’s the feedback from the Reddit community:
These commenters supported firmly confronting the neighbors and making it clear that unauthorized access will not be tolerated







These commenters emphasized installing a secure pool fence and locked gate to protect children and reduce the homeowner’s liability








These commenters warned that the neighbors’ behavior could create serious legal and financial consequences if a child is injured










These commenters shared experiences with people treating private pools as though they were community amenities
















OP’s frustration is understandable, especially after waking up to strangers using a private pool and damaging property.
Owning a pool does not automatically make it a community amenity, and the mother’s argument that OP should “share” because others cannot afford one ignores both permission and responsibility.
The children may have been too young to face legal consequences, but that does not make the incident acceptable.
Would you have handled the situation the same way by calling the police, or tried speaking with the parents first?
How would you set boundaries with neighbors without creating a long-term feud? Share your thoughts below.

















