Woman Cancels Big Box Membership To Spite Stingy In-Laws

OP and their husband have a Big Box membership, but their stingy sister-in-law (SIL) and brother-in-law (BIL) borrowed the card without returning it or agreeing to split the $50/year cost.

Annoyed by their cheapness, OP canceled the membership without warning, leaving them humiliated when the card failed at checkout. OP relishes the petty revenge. Was OP wrong for this move?

This story dives into stinginess, petty revenge, and family boundaries. Did OP go too far? Let’s explore the details and see what the online community thinks.

This story illustrates family conflict over exploited generosity and lack of fairness. SIL and BIL’s refusal to share the membership cost while using the card shows disrespect.

Psychologist Dr. Henry Cloud notes, “Clear boundaries protect relationships from exploitation and resentment” (Boundaries).

OP’s cancellation was a petty but effective way to enforce boundaries, though a direct conversation about cost-sharing might have avoided escalation.

SIL and BIL should recognize that using the card for free is a privilege, not a right. This case highlights the importance of fairness and communication in family dynamics.

Here are the comments of Reddit users:

Reddit supports OP, laughing at SIL and BIL’s cheapness and sharing similar stories of revoking shared memberships or services. Many praise OP’s petty revenge as “satisfying” and “deserved.” Here’s a roundup of reactions.

Many cheer OP’s revenge.

Some share similar experiences.

A few emphasize boundaries.

This woman’s stealth cancellation of her Big Box membership left her freeloading in-laws stranded at checkout, a petty but satisfying lesson in gratitude. Was it a clever clapback, or a sneaky jab?

With Reddit cackling and family ties intact, this saga’s a lesson in tackling entitlement with a smirk. How would you handle stingy relatives? Share your thoughts below!