Finding your own driveway blocked is frustrating enough. Discovering that the driver has disappeared when you have somewhere important to be makes the situation much harder, especially when phone calls and a quick search produce absolutely no solution.
One Redditor encountered exactly that problem while leaving for a doctor’s appointment. A contractor working elsewhere in his townhome community had parked an SUV completely across the driveway, then apparently walked away.
After searching nearby and unsuccessfully calling the leasing office, the OP noticed something unusual: the vehicle was unlocked, its rear hatch was open, and the keys were still sitting in the ignition.
With the clock ticking, he made a decision that solved his immediate problem but crossed a boundary some people might consider significant. Scroll down to see what he did and whether Reddit thought he went too far.
A homeowner moves a contractor’s truck after it blocks her driveway and prevents her from leaving for an appointment














Few things create instant frustration like discovering that another person’s carelessness has taken control of your schedule. The OP had a doctor’s appointment, their spouse needed to handle daycare, and a contractor had completely blocked the household’s driveway before apparently disappearing.
After searching nearby and receiving no answer from the leasing office, the OP faced an irritating choice: miss or delay an appointment because of somebody else’s parking decision, or solve the problem personally. That urgency makes the decision understandable, even if moving a stranger’s vehicle introduces another set of concerns.
Emotionally, this conflict is largely about control and responsibility. The worker temporarily removed the OP’s ability to leave home, apparently without asking permission or remaining immediately available.
Finding the keys then offered an unusually easy solution. From the OP’s perspective, moving the SUV a short distance probably felt less like interfering with someone’s property and more like restoring access to their own.
The worker, however, may have returned to discover that a stranger had entered and driven his vehicle. His irritation can therefore make sense even while his original parking choice was inconsiderate.
That distinction offers a more interesting perspective than simply deciding who behaved worse. People tend to judge their own questionable choices through circumstances while judging someone else’s through the action itself.
The OP thinks, reasonably, “I had an appointment and exhausted the obvious options.” The contractor might think, “Someone entered my truck without permission.” Both descriptions can be true simultaneously.
Social psychologist Saul McLeod explains the fundamental attribution error as our tendency to overemphasize personality when explaining another person’s behavior while underestimating situational pressures.
Someone seeing a badly parked truck might quickly conclude its driver is inconsiderate; someone discovering their vehicle has been moved might similarly conclude the person responsible is disrespectful. In both cases, missing context can intensify the judgment.
Psychologist Guy Winch also explains that anger frequently emerges when people perceive unfairness or believe their goals have been obstructed. The feeling itself can identify a legitimate problem, but acting while angry can produce decisions carrying consequences beyond the original grievance.
That fits this situation well. The OP had every reason to object to having the driveway blocked. Yet entering and operating another person’s vehicle potentially creates avoidable complications involving damage, accusations, insurance, or local law, even when nothing bad actually happens.
A safer response in any repeat situation would be to photograph the obstruction, document attempts to locate the driver, contact property management or the contractor’s company, and use whatever authorized towing or enforcement process applies locally.
The worker created the original problem. The lesson for the OP is simply that fixing someone else’s bad decision should not require taking on unnecessary liability of their own.
See what others had to share with OP:
These users said the driver caused the problem and was lucky OP did not have him towed



These Redditors felt OP was morally justified even if the legal details were less certain



These commenters joked that leaving the keys made the truck fair game to be moved





These commenters stressed that blocking a driveway could create serious problems during an emergency







What do you think? Share your thoughts in the comments!














