A misdelivered package is usually an annoying but easy problem to fix. Most people simply hand it over and move on.
Unfortunately, that simple outcome depends on the person who received it being willing to do the right thing.
That was not what happened to one homeowner after new security devices were accidentally delivered next door.
The neighbor initially claimed there was no package, even though the delivery app clearly showed the items at his address.
After being shown the proof, he eventually produced the devices, but there was another problem: they had already been installed and linked to his own setup.
The poster refused to accept them and insisted on replacements, which only added another argument to an already difficult relationship.
Keep reading to see why the poster is now wondering whether calling the police may be the only option left.
A homeowner confronts a neighbor who installed security devices from a package delivered to the wrong address




















It is unsettling when a mistake exposes something much bigger about a person you already do not trust.
In this case, the delivery error itself was harmless. Packages sometimes end up at the wrong address.
What changed the situation was what happened afterward: the neighbor apparently opened the package, installed the Ring devices on his own property, denied having them when confronted, and only admitted what happened after being shown delivery evidence.
That would leave most people feeling violated, angry, and uncertain about what he might do next.
The emotional conflict is understandable because the homeowner does not simply want the devices back.
They want to feel comfortable living beside someone who has already been loud, aggressive, and difficult in the past.
Calling him a thief in the moment probably came from accumulated frustration rather than one isolated incident.
But when someone has a history of aggressive behavior, winning the argument can become less important than reducing opportunities for another confrontation.
A fresh perspective is that improving this relationship may not mean becoming friendlier.
Sometimes the healthiest version of a difficult neighbor relationship is polite distance.
The goal does not need to be trust, closeness, or even mutual understanding. It can simply be predictability: brief interactions, clear limits, and no unnecessary engagement.
The homeowner has already communicated the important boundary: their property is not available for the neighbor to take or use.
There is probably little value in continuing to debate his explanation that Amazon was responsible.
A delivery mistake explains why the package reached his porch; it does not explain installing someone else’s equipment.
The practical path forward is documentation rather than repeated confrontation.
Save delivery photographs, messages, camera footage, dates of disturbances, and descriptions of serious incidents.
Keep future exchanges short and neutral.
If another package is taken, property is damaged, threats occur, or behavior becomes unsafe, using appropriate building management or law-enforcement channels is more sensible than handling everything face-to-face.
The relationship may never become warm, and that is okay.
With a difficult neighbor, success can simply mean creating enough boundaries that neither household has much reason to interact at all.
Here’s how people reacted to the post:
These Redditors recommended reporting package theft and using police if it happens again






This group suggested filing missing-package claims and getting refunds or replacements









These users blamed the neighbor for knowingly keeping items that clearly were not his








These users distinguished accidental misdelivery from knowingly keeping someone else’s package














What began as a misdelivered package became much more serious once the neighbor installed equipment that clearly wasn’t his and only returned it after being confronted with proof.
Given the history of drinking, aggression, and boundary problems, the poster’s concern about escalation seems understandable.
At this point, keeping interactions brief and documented may matter more than trying to force a friendly relationship.
Do you think calling the police for future incidents would be reasonable, or should the poster keep trying to resolve things directly? How would you handle a neighbor you no longer trust?
















